Wash. Rev. Code » Title 48 · Chapter 48.19
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.040 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Every insurer or rating organization shall, before using, file with the commissioner every classifications manual, manual of rules and rates, rating plan, rating schedule, minimum rate, class rate, and rating rule, and every modification of any of the foregoing which it proposes. The insurer need not so file any rate on individually rated risks as described in subdivision (1) of RCW 48.19.030; except that any such specific rate made by a rating organization shall be filed.
(2) Every such filing shall indicate the type and extent of the coverage contemplated and must be accompanied by sufficient information to permit the commissioner to determine whether it meets the requirements of this chapter. An insurer or rating organization shall offer in support of any filing:
(a) The experience or judgment of the insurer or rating organization making the filing;
(b) An exhibit detailing the major elements of operating expense for the types of insurance affected by the filing;
(c) An explanation of how investment income has been taken into account in the proposed rates; and
(d) Any other information which the insurer or rating organization deems relevant.
(3) If an insurer has insufficient loss experience to support its proposed rates, it may submit:
(a) Loss experience for similar exposures of other insurers or of a rating organization; or
(b) A complete and logical explanation of how it has developed its proposed rates, including the insurer's analysis of any relevant information and showing why the proposed rates should be considered to meet the requirements of RCW 48.19.020.
(4) Every such filing shall state its proposed effective date.
(5)(a) A filing made pursuant to this chapter shall be exempt from the provisions of RCW 48.02.120(3). However, the filing and all supporting information accompanying it shall be open to public inspection only after the filing becomes effective, except as provided in (b) of this subsection.
(b) For the purpose of this section, "usage-based insurance" means private passenger automobile coverage that uses data gathered from any recording device as defined in RCW 46.35.010, or a system, or business method that records and preserves data arising from the actual usage of a motor vehicle to determine rates or premiums. Information in a filing of usage-based insurance about the usage-based component of the rate is confidential and must be withheld from public inspection.
(6) Where a filing is required no insurer shall make or issue an insurance contract or policy except in accordance with its filing then in effect, except as is provided by RCW 48.19.090.
[ 2013 c 152 s 2; 2012 c 222 s 1; 1994 c 131 s 8; 1989 c 25 s 4; 1983 1st ex.s. c 32 s 14; 1947 c 79 s .19.04; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.19.04.]

Notes:

Effective date—1989 c 25: See note following RCW 48.18.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007). · cites it 3× “RCW § 48.19.040. The Commissioner undertakes a review of a given rate filing “as soon as reasonably possible,” and imposes a waiting period of no less than 30 days for that review to take place, at the end of which the filing becomes effective if not disapproved by the…”
Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Kueckelhan, 425 P.2d 669 (Wash. 1967). · cites it 4× “RCW 48.19.040. [1] Against this background of administrative responsibility, investigative power, and regulatory authority coupled to specified insurer obligations, and with the knowledge of the use and availability of an existent examining bureau, [5] the 1947 legislature…”
Ins. Co. of North Am. Companies v. Sullivan, 352 P.2d 193 (Wash. 1960). · cites it 2× “RCW 48.19.040. The arguments of the respective parties to this appeal consist, primarily, of references to various sections and subsections of the governing statute, RCW 48.”
Sandwich Chef of Texas, Inc. v. Reliance Nat'l Indem. Ins., 202 F.R.D. 484 (S.D. Tex. 2001). “2-2003 (Michie 1999); Wash Rev Code Ann § 48.19.040 (West 1999); Wis.”
Ritter v. Shotwell, 388 P.2d 527 (Wash. 1964). · cites it 2× “RCW 48.19.040. Page C-13 of the manual applies to supply contracts.”
Alpert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 494 P.3d 419 (Wash. 2021). · cites it 2× “In Washington, for example, once an insurer files a rate with the OIC and the rate is approved, the insurer can sell insurance only according to the parameters of that rate. RCW 48.19.040(6).”
Leslie v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 598 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “140 with RCW 48.19.040(6). At a minimum, had the Legislature intended a deviation from filed rates to constitute a per se violation of the CPA, it would have included affirmative *1182 language prohibiting the deviation from filed rates.”
Guercia v. AON Affinity Ins. Servs. Inc (E.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 6× “040 and 48.18.180 do not constitute a per se unfair trade 5 practice, nor has Plaintiff alleged violations of these statutes or WAC 284-30-750.”
Does 1, 2, 4, 5, Appellants/cross-respondents V. Sam Sueoka, Respondents/cross-appellants (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “040(5)(b) the rate pursuant to RCW 48.19.040(5)(b) 42.56.400(21); 42.56.”
Resident Action Council v. Seattle Hous. Auth. (Wash. 2013). “"Information in a filing of usage-based insurance about the usage- based component of the rate pursuant to RCW 48.19.040(5)(b)" .400(20) 60.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.040(1) — 1 case
Guercia v. AON Affinity Ins. Servs. Inc (E.D. Wash. 2025). “040 and 48.18.180 do not constitute a per se unfair trade 5 practice, nor has Plaintiff alleged violations of these statutes or WAC 284-30-750.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.040(3) — 1 case
Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Kueckelhan, 425 P.2d 669 (Wash. 1967). “RCW 48.19.040. [1] Against this background of administrative responsibility, investigative power, and regulatory authority coupled to specified insurer obligations, and with the knowledge of the use and availability of an existent examining bureau, [5] the 1947 legislature…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.040(5)(b) — 2 cases
Does 1, 2, 4, 5, Appellants/cross-respondents V. Sam Sueoka, Respondents/cross-appellants (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “040(5)(b) the rate pursuant to RCW 48.19.040(5)(b) 42.56.400(21); 42.56.”
Resident Action Council v. Seattle Hous. Auth. (Wash. 2013). “"Information in a filing of usage-based insurance about the usage- based component of the rate pursuant to RCW 48.19.040(5)(b)" .400(20) 60.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.040(6) — 2 cases
Leslie v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 598 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “140 with RCW 48.19.040(6). At a minimum, had the Legislature intended a deviation from filed rates to constitute a per se violation of the CPA, it would have included affirmative *1182 language prohibiting the deviation from filed rates.”
Alpert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 494 P.3d 419 (Wash. 2021). “In Washington, for example, once an insurer files a rate with the OIC and the rate is approved, the insurer can sell insurance only according to the parameters of that rate. RCW 48.19.040(6).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.