Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.190 (2026)

Suspension or revocation of license

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The commissioner may, after a hearing, suspend or revoke the license issued to a rating organization for any of the following causes:

(a) If he or she finds that the licensee no longer meets the qualifications for the license.

(b) For failure to comply with an order of the commissioner within the time limited by the order, or any extension thereof which the commissioner may grant.

(2) The commissioner shall not so suspend or revoke a license for failure to comply with an order until the time prescribed by this code for an appeal from such order to the superior court has expired or if such appeal has been taken, until such order has been affirmed.

(3) The commissioner may determine when a suspension or revocation of license shall become effective. A suspension of license shall remain in effect for the period fixed by him or her, unless he or she modifies or rescinds the suspension, or until the order, failure to comply with which constituted grounds for the suspension, is modified, rescinded or reversed.

[ 2009 c 549 s 7085; 1947 c 79 s .19.19; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.19.19.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1976–2009 · leading case: Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau, 558 P.2d 215 (Wash. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau, 558 P.2d 215 (Wash. 1976). · cites it 4× “RCW 48.19.190. In order to determine if a rating organization is in fact operating according to law and is in compliance with the licensing requirements, RCW 48.”

Leslie v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 598 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “(citing RCW 48.19.190). In her response, Plaintiff maintains that the implied contract between Fidelity and Plaintiff, whereby Fidelity agrees to charge a lawful rate, is separate from the written contract between Fidelity and Wells Fargo, and thus “Fidelity’s appeal to the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.