Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.32.910 (2026)

Construction—1971 ex.s. c 265

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be liberally construed to effect the purpose under RCW 48.32.010 which shall constitute an aid and guide to interpretation.
[ 1971 ex.s. c 265 s 19.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1990–1999 · leading case: Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Washington Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 804 P.2d 1263 (Wash. 1991).
Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Washington Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 804 P.2d 1263 (Wash. 1991). · cites it 2× “The law cited is very similar to RCW 48.32.910 of the WIGA Act. Equivalent state guaranty association statutes were also held to support an insured's claim for costs and fees against Florida's guaranty association in Zinke-Smith, Inc.”
Washington Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. McKinstry Co., 784 P.2d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “" RCW 48.32.910. To accomplish the purpose of avoiding financial loss, the Act provides that WIGA shall [b]e deemed the insurer to the extent of its obligation on the covered claims and to such extent shall have all rights, duties, and obligations of the insolvent insurer as if…”
Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Washington Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 972 P.2d 1282 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “[and] be deemed the insurer to the extent of its obligation on the covered claims and to such extent shall have all rights, duties, and obligations of the insolvent insurer as if the insurer had not become insolvent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.