Wash. Rev. Code » Title 49 · Chapter 49.04
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 49.04.030 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The director of labor and industries shall appoint and deputize an assistant director to be known as the supervisor of apprenticeship. Under the supervision of the director of labor and industries and with the advice and guidance of the apprenticeship council, the supervisor shall: (1) Encourage and promote apprenticeship programs conforming to the standards established under this chapter, and in harmony with the policies of the United States department of labor; (2) act as secretary of the apprenticeship council and of state apprenticeship committees; (3) when authorized by the apprenticeship council, register apprenticeship agreements that are in the best interests of the apprentice and conform with standards established under this chapter; (4) keep a record of apprenticeship agreements and upon successful completion issue certificates of completion of apprenticeship; (5) when authorized by the council, terminate or cancel any apprenticeship agreements in accordance with the provisions of the agreements; and (6) conduct reviews for compliance with this chapter, rules established under this chapter, and 29 C.F.R. Parts 29 and 30.
The supervisor may act to bring about the settlement of differences arising out of the apprenticeship agreement where such differences cannot be adjusted locally. The director of labor and industries is authorized to appoint such other personnel as may be necessary to aid the supervisor of apprenticeship in the execution of the supervisor's functions under this chapter.
[ 2011 c 308 s 2; 2001 c 204 s 2; 1979 ex.s. c 37 s 2; 1961 c 114 s 2; 1941 c 231 s 2; Rem. Supp. 1941 s 7614-4.]

Notes:

Rehabilitation services for individuals with disabilities: Chapter 74.29 RCW.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1996–2008 · leading case: Seattle Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Seattle Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996). · cites it 2× “RCW 49.04.030. In accord with the legislative directive in RCW 49.”
Constr. Indus. Training Council v. Washington State Apprenticeship & Training Council, 977 P.2d 655 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “We thus conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to find that the Council’s actions were substantially justified.”
Seattle Area Plumbers, Hous. Plumbers, Pipefitters, Refrigeration, & Marine Pipefitters Apprenticeship Comm. v. Washington State Apprenticeship & Training Council, 131 Wash. App. 862 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 49.04.030; WAC 296-05-107. ¶3 In order to form a state-recognized apprenticeship program in Washington, an organization must first organize a training committee and obtain Council approval of the committee.”
Seattle Area Plumbers v. Apprenticeship & Training Council, 129 P.3d 838 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 49.04.030; WAC 296-05-107. ¶ 3 In order to form a state-recognized apprenticeship program in Washington, an organization must first organize a training committee and obtain Council approval of the committee.”
W. Washington Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Comm. v. Washington State Apprenticeship & Training Council, 190 P.3d 506 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “…to the Council that it cancel programs that are operating inconsistently with their established program standards. RCW 49.04.030; WAC 296-05-321.”
Seattle Bldg. Council v. Appren. Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996). · cites it 2× “RCW 49.04.030. In accord with the legislative directive in RCW 49.”
W. Wash. Operating Eng. v. Council, 190 P.3d 506 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “…recommend to the Council that it cancel a program operating inconsistently with its established program standards. RCW 49.04.030; WAC 296-05-321.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.