Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 49.48.050 (2026)

Remedy cumulative

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing herein contained shall be construed to limit the authority of the prosecuting attorney of any county to prosecute actions, both civil and criminal, for such violations of RCW 49.48.040 through 49.48.080 as may come to his or her knowledge, or to enforce the provisions hereof independently and without specific direction of the director of labor and industries.

[ 2010 c 8 s 12049; 1935 c 96 s 2; RRS s 7596-2.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: Microsoft Corp. v. Atm Shafiqul Khalid (Wash. Ct. App. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Microsoft Corp. v. Atm Shafiqul Khalid (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “9 Khalid’s complaint seeks declaratory relief associated with several other claims we have determined to be time-barred, such as alleged violations of RCW 19.”

Taber v. Cascade Designs Incoporated (W.D. Wash. 2022). “See RCW 49.48.050 and 49.48.070. Plaintiff provides 7 no legal support for expanding these laws to cover the tax claims she asserts.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.