Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.200 (2026)
Unfair practices of employment agencies
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is an unfair practice for any employment agency to fail or refuse to classify properly or refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, an individual because of age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability, or to print or circulate, or cause to be printed or circulated any statement, advertisement, or publication, or to use any form of application for employment, or to make any inquiry in connection with prospective employment, which expresses any limitation, specification or discrimination as to age, sex, race, sexual orientation, creed, color, or national origin, citizenship or immigration status, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability, or any intent to make any such limitation, specification, or discrimination, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification: PROVIDED, Nothing contained herein shall prohibit advertising in a foreign language.
[ 2020 c 52 s 12; 2007 c 187 s 11; 2006 c 4 s 12; 1997 c 271 s 12; 1993 c 510 s 14; 1973 1st ex.s. c 214 s 9; 1973 c 141 s 12; 1971 ex.s. c 81 s 5; 1961 c 100 s 3; 1957 c 37 s 11. Prior: 1949 c 183 s 7, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 7614-26, part.]
Notes:
Severability—1993 c 510: See note following RCW 49.60.010.
Effective date—1971 ex.s. c 81: See note following RCW 49.60.120.
Element of age not to affect apprenticeship agreements: RCW 49.04.910.
Fraud by employment agent: RCW 49.44.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, 897 N.W.2d 553 (Iowa 2017).
Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, 897 N.W.2d 553 (Iowa 2017). “, Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.200 (1957); Wis. Stat.”
Fahn v. Cowlitz Cnty., 610 P.2d 857 (Wash. 1981). “180(4) and RCW 49.60.200 and to have the force of law where they apply.”
Jin Zhu v. N. Cent. Educ. Serv. Dist. (Wash. 2017). “Third, RCW 49.60.200 defines practices by employment agencies that are unfair when based on a person's protected characteristics, including refusal to refer the person for employment and inquiring into the person's protected characteristics in connection with prospective…”
Amended August 25, 2017 Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (Iowa 2017). “, Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.200 (1957); Wis. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.