Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.310 (2026)

Misdemeanor to interfere with or resist commission

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who wilfully resists, prevents, impedes, or interferes with the commission or any of its members or representatives in the performance of duty under this chapter, or who wilfully violates an order of the commission, is guilty of a misdemeanor; but procedure for the review of the order shall not be deemed to be such wilful conduct.
[ 1985 c 185 s 26; 1961 c 100 s 4; 1957 c 37 s 26; 1949 c 183 s 10; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 7614-28.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1961–1967 · leading case: O'Meara v. Washington State Bd. Against Discrimination, 365 P.2d 1 (Wash. 1961).
O'Meara v. Washington State Bd. Against Discrimination, 365 P.2d 1 (Wash. 1961). · cites it 4× “270) to avoid punishment for disobeying the tribunal's order, which is a misdemeanor (RCW 49.60.310). The superior court reversed the tribunal's order upon the ground that the act authorizing coerced sales of private homes to Negroes is unconstitutional.”
Washington State Bd. Against Discrimination v. Bd. of Directors, 412 P.2d 769 (Wash. 1966). · cites it 2× “[4] Parenthetically, it is to be noted that the law against discrimination contains a section (RCW 49.60.310), which defines as misdemeanors the doing of certain wilfull acts which interfere with the Board in the performance of its duties.”
In Re Johnson, 427 P.2d 968 (Wash. 1967). “" RCW 49.60.310. [4] "No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing records, correspondence, documents or other evidence in obedience to the subpoena of the board or of any individual member, on the ground that the testimony or evidence required of…”
Wheeler v. Washington State Bd. against Discrimination, 427 P.2d 968 (Wash. 1967). “” RCW 49.60.310. “No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing records, correspondence, documents or other evidence in obedience to the subpoena of the board or of any individual member, on the ground that the testimony or evidence required of him…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.