Wash. Rev. Code » Title 50 · Chapter 50.32
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 50.32.180 (2026)

Remedies of title exclusive

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The remedies provided in this title for determining the justness or correctness of assessments, refunds, adjustments, or claims shall be exclusive and no court shall entertain any action to enjoin an assessment or require a refund or adjustment except in accordance with the provisions of this title. Matters which may be determined by the procedures set out in this title shall not be the subject of any declaratory judgment.
[ 1945 c 35 s 134; Rem. Supp. 1945 s 9998-272.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1960–2017 · leading case: Washington Trucking Ass'n v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 192 Wash. App. 621 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Washington Trucking Ass'n v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 192 Wash. App. 621 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “ce claims, but whether WTA has associational standing to assert a § 1983 claim cannot be determined based on the complaint allegations; (2) WTA’s and the *630 Carriers’ § 1983 claim is barred by the principle of comity to the extent that they seek damages in the amount of the…”
State ex rel. Ass'n of Washington Indus. v. Johnson, 353 P.2d 881 (Wash. 1960). · cites it 2× “” RCW 50.32.180 provides: “The remedies provided in this title for determining the justness or correctness of assessments, refunds, adjustments, or claims shall be exclusive and no court shall entertain any action to enjoin an assessment or require a refund or adjustment except…”
Wash. Trucking Ass'ns v. Emp't Sec. Dep't (Wash. 2017). · cites it 3× “The appeals court further held that the exclusive remedy provision of Washington's Employment Security Act, RCW 50.32.180, bars the tort claim only -2- Washington Trucking Ass 'ns, et al.”
Swanson Hay Co. v. Emp. Sec. Dep't (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “In a decision filed earlier this year, the Supreme Court held that the § 1983 claim was barred by comity and the tortious interference claim was barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the ESA, RCW 50.32.180. Wash. Trucking Ass 'ns v. Emp 't Sec.”
State Ex Rel. Ass'n Etc. v. Johnson, 353 P.2d 881 (Wash. 1960). · cites it 2× “" RCW 50.32.180 provides: "The remedies provided in this title for determining the justness or correctness of assessments, refunds, adjustments, or claims shall be exclusive and no court shall entertain any action to enjoin an assessment or require a refund or adjustment except…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.