Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 51.36.070 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1)(a) Whenever the department or the self-insurer deems it necessary in order to (i) make a decision regarding claim allowance or reopening, (ii) resolve a new medical issue, an appeal, or case progress, or (iii) evaluate the worker's permanent disability or work restriction, a worker shall submit to examination by a physician or physicians selected by the department, with the rendition of a report to the person ordering the examination, the attending provider, and the injured worker.
(b) The examination must be at a place reasonably convenient to the injured worker, or alternatively utilize telemedicine if the department determines telemedicine is appropriate for the examination. For purposes of this subsection, "reasonably convenient" means at a place where residents in the injured worker's community would normally travel to seek medical care for the same specialty as the examiner. The department must address in rule how to accommodate the injured worker if no approved medical examiner in the specialty needed is available in that community.
(2) The department or self-insurer shall provide the physician performing an examination with all relevant medical records from the worker's claim file. The director, in his or her discretion, may charge the cost of such examination or examinations to the self-insurer or to the medical aid fund as the case may be. The cost of said examination shall include payment to the worker of reasonable expenses connected therewith.
(3) For purposes of this section, "examination" means a physical or mental examination by a medical care provider licensed to practice medicine, osteopathy, podiatry, chiropractic, dentistry, or psychiatry at the request of the department or self-insured employer.
(4)(a) The worker has the right to record the audio, video, or both, of all examinations ordered under this section, RCW 51.32.110, or by the board of industrial insurance appeals.
(b) The worker or the worker's representative must provide notice to the entity scheduling the examination that the examination will be recorded no less than seven calendar days before the date of the examination. The department must adopt rules to define the notification process.
(c) The worker is responsible for paying the costs of recording.
(d) Upon request, the worker must provide one copy of the recording to the department or self-insured employer within 14 days of receiving the request, but in no case prior to the issuance of a written report of the examination.
(e) The worker must take reasonable steps to ensure the recording equipment does not interfere with the examination. The worker may not hold the recording equipment while the examination is occurring.
(f) The worker may not materially alter the recording. Benefits received as a result of any material alteration of the recording by the worker or done on the worker's behalf may be subject to repayment pursuant to RCW 51.32.240.
(g) The worker may not post the recording to social media.
(h) Recordings made under this subsection are deemed confidential pursuant to RCW 51.28.070.
(i) The worker has the right to have one person, who is at least the age of majority and who is of the worker's choosing, to be present to observe all examinations ordered under this section, RCW 51.32.110, or by the board of industrial insurance appeals. The observer must be unobtrusive and not interfere with the examination. The observer may not be the worker's legal representative, an employee of the legal representative, the worker's attending provider, or an employee of the worker's attending provider.
(5) This section applies prospectively to all claims regardless of the date of injury.
[ 2023 c 171 s 12; 2023 c 166 s 1; 2020 c 213 s 3; 2001 c 152 s 2; 1977 ex.s. c 350 s 60; 1971 ex.s. c 289 s 54.]
Notes:
Effective date—Retroactive application—2023 c 171: See note following RCW 51.04.050.
Effective date—2020 c 213 ss 1-3: See note following RCW 51.08.121.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Ziegler v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 708 P.2d 1212 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985).
Ziegler v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 708 P.2d 1212 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985). “) The dispositive issue is whether the costs of the RCW 51.36.070 1 ordered medical examinations are reimbursable to the Department as "compensation and benefits paid".”
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr., 555 P.3d 445 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
Ten Injured Workers V. State Of Washington, 553 P.3d 726 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Ten injured workers sued the State of Washington, the director of the Department of Labor and Industries, and the state attorney general1 under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ch.”
Alfredo Suarez, V. Masco Corp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “110 and RCW 51.36.070, Mr. Suarez was required to submit to an examination by a physician selected by the self-insured employer” and that “Suarez did not have good cause within the meaning of RCW 51.”
Off. Careers, V State Labor & Indus. (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “110 (“As required under RCW 51.36.070, any worker entitled to receive any benefits or claiming such under this title shall, if requested by the department or self-insurer, submit himself or herself for medical examination, at a place reasonably convenient for the worker.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.36.070(1)(a) — 3 cases
Alfredo Suarez, V. Masco Corp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “110 and RCW 51.36.070, Mr. Suarez was required to submit to an examination by a physician selected by the self-insured employer” and that “Suarez did not have good cause within the meaning of RCW 51.”
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr., 555 P.3d 445 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.36.070(1)(b) — 2 cases
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Med. Ctr., 555 P.3d 445 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Former RCW 51.36.070 (2001). This subsequently changed when the legislature revised the IIA in 2020 to expressly permit examinations by telehealth.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.36.070(4)(g) — 1 case
Ten Injured Workers V. State Of Washington, 553 P.3d 726 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Ten injured workers sued the State of Washington, the director of the Department of Labor and Industries, and the state attorney general1 under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.