Wash. Rev. Code » Title 6 · Chapter 6.23
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Real property sold subject to redemption, as provided in RCW 6.21.080, or any part thereof separately sold, may be redeemed by the following persons, or their successors in interest:
(a) The judgment debtor, in the whole or any part of the property separately sold.
(b) A creditor having a lien by judgment, decree, deed of trust, or mortgage, on any portion of the property, or any portion of any part thereof, separately sold, subsequent in priority to that on which the property was sold. The persons mentioned in this subsection are termed redemptioners.
(2) As used in this chapter, the terms "judgment debtor," "redemptioner," and "purchaser" refer also to their respective successors in interest.
[ 2013 c 53 s 1; 1987 c 442 s 701; 1899 c 53 s 7; RRS s 594. Prior: 1897 c 50 s 15. Formerly RCW 6.24.130.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 328 P.3d 895 (Wash. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 328 P.3d 895 (Wash. 2014). · cites it 5× “Bank of America attempted to redeem the condominium under the redemption statute, RCW 6.23.010. Because Bank of America recorded its deed of trust before Lewis defaulted on her assessments, the trial *757 court and Court of Appeals held that Bank of America did not record its…”
Performance Constr., App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-app, 380 P.3d 618 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “The order stated that there are no qualified redemptioners for the Property as defined in RCW 6.23.010. It directed the sheriff to issue Keene a sheriff’s deed to the Property free and clear of any rights of redemption.”
Summerhill Vill. Homeowners Ass'n v. Roughley, 270 P.3d 639 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “” 9 ¶13 RCW 6.23.010 identifies qualified redemptioners: (1) Real property sold subject to redemption, as provided in RCW 6.”
Potter v. Washington State Patrol, 165 Wash. 2d 67 (Wash. 2008). “The dissent makes much of the fact that the statute states that vehicles “may be redeemed only under the following circumstances” as evidence that the legislature intended that this hearing be the exclusive remedy.”
Potter v. Washington State Patrol, 196 P.3d 691 (Wash. 2008). “[11] The dissent makes much of the fact that the statute states that vehicles "may be redeemed only under the following circumstances," as evidence that the legislature intended that this hearing be the exclusive remedy.”
Millay v. Cam, 135 Wash. 2d 193 (Wash. 1998). “It appears to be a right from a judgment debtor that expired after a year (RCW 6.23.010, 6.23.040), and the interest was likely the result of fraud and/or never was actually assigned to Evans.”
Millay v. Cam, 955 P.2d 791 (Wash. 1998). “It appears to be a right from a judgment debtor that expired after a year (RCW 6.23.010, 6.23.040), and the interest was likely the result of fraud and/or never was actually assigned to Evans.”
DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd., 1 P.3d 587 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “See RCW 6.23.010 (defining who may redeem); 6.”
Camp Fin., LLC v. Brazington, 135 P.3d 946 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “¶ 19 The Brazingtons respond that under the clear language of the statutes (RCW 6.21.030(1) and RCW 6.”
Walcker v. Benson & McLaughlin, PS, 904 P.2d 1176 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995). “…but was determining whether a right of redemption applied to deeds of trust under former RCW 6.24.130(2). See RCW 6.23.010.”
Olson Eng'g, Inc. v. KeyBank Nat'l Ass'n, 286 P.3d 390 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 6.23.010, .020(1); 18 William B. Stoebuck & John W.”
P.H.T.S., LLC v. Vantage Capital, LLC, 345 P.3d 20 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “To redeem the property from the purchaser, the judgment debtor must pay (1) the amount bid at the sheriff’s sale with interest, (2) any assessment or taxes paid by the purchaser with interest, and (3) any sum paid by the purchaser on a prior lien or obligation secured by an…”
Show all 38 citing cases →
— Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010(1) — 4 cases
Performance Constr., App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-app, 380 P.3d 618 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The order stated that there are no qualified redemptioners for the Property as defined in RCW 6.23.010. It directed the sheriff to issue Keene a sheriff’s deed to the Property free and clear of any rights of redemption.”
Performance Constr., Llc v. Change Investments & Cascades Concepts (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re The Est. Of: Daphne May Burns (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re The Est. Of: Daphne May Burns (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010(1)(a) — 4 cases
Pnc Bank Na v. Jerry Reeves (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
Madrona Lisa, Llc v. Vera Semenyuk (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re The Est. Of: Daphne May Burns (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re The Est. Of: Daphne May Burns (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010(1)(b) — 5 cases
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 328 P.3d 895 (Wash. 2014). “Bank of America attempted to redeem the condominium under the redemption statute, RCW 6.23.010. Because Bank of America recorded its deed of trust before Lewis defaulted on her assessments, the trial *757 court and Court of Appeals held that Bank of America did not record its…”
Summerhill Vill. Homeowners Ass'n v. Roughley, 270 P.3d 639 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “” 9 ¶13 RCW 6.23.010 identifies qualified redemptioners: (1) Real property sold subject to redemption, as provided in RCW 6.”
Camp Fin., LLC v. Brazington, 135 P.3d 946 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “¶ 19 The Brazingtons respond that under the clear language of the statutes (RCW 6.21.030(1) and RCW 6.”
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright (Wash. 2014).
Dynamic Funding, Llc v. Seawind Homeowners Ass'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2017).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010(2) — 3 cases
Capital Inv. Corp. v. King Cnty., 47 P.3d 161 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002).
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 298 P.3d 779 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).
Bac Home Loans Servicing, Lp, App. v. Michael Fulbright, Resps. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 6.23.010(l)(b) — 3 cases
Camp Fin., L.L.C. v. Brazington, 133 Wash. App. 156 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006).
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Fulbright, 298 P.3d 779 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).
Capital Inv. Corp. v. King Cnty., 47 P.3d 161 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.