Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 60.10.023 (2026)

Judicial foreclosure of personal property liens

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of chapter 61.12 RCW, so far as they are applicable, govern in actions for the judicial foreclosure of liens on personal property excluded by *RCW 62A.9-104 from the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, Title 62A RCW. The lienholder may proceed on the lien; and if there is a separate obligation secured by the lien, the lienholder may bring suit on the obligation. If the lienor proceeds on the obligation, the court shall, in addition to entering a decree foreclosing the lien, render judgment for the amount due on the obligation. The decree shall direct the sale of the lien property, and if there is a judgment on an obligation and the proceeds of the sale are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the sheriff is authorized to proceed under the same execution and levy on and sell other property of the lien debtor, not exempt from execution, for the sum remaining unsatisfied.

Redemption rights and the rights and interest of a purchaser for value under this section are governed by RCW 60.10.040 and 60.10.050.

[ 1995 c 62 s 1; 1969 c 82 s 1. Formerly RCW 61.12.162.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: Article 62A.9 RCW was repealed in its entirety by 2000 c 250 s 9A-901, effective July 1, 2001. For later enactment, see Article 62A.9A RCW.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2014 · leading case: Peyton Bldg., LLC v. Niko's Gourmet, Inc., 323 P.3d 629 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Peyton Bldg., LLC v. Niko's Gourmet, Inc., 323 P.3d 629 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Peyton argued, “[M]uch of or most of the restaurant equipment was provided and owned by Pacific Securit[y] as the owner/landlord when the lease commenced.”

Peyton Bldg., LLC v. Nikos Gourmet Inc. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Peyton argued "much of or most of the restaurant equipment was provided and owned 13 No.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.