Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 61.24.120 (2026)

Other foreclosure provisions preserved

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall not supersede nor repeal any other provision now made by law for the foreclosure of security interests in real property.

[ 1965 c 74 s 12.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Valerie J. Slotke, 367 P.3d 600 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Valerie J. Slotke, 367 P.3d 600 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “State Bar Ass’n, Washington Real Property Deskbook Series: Real Estate Essentials § 21.”

Donovick v. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 757 P.2d 1378 (Wash. 1988). · cites it 2× “…the security as a mortgage nor from enforcing the obligation by any means provided by law. RCW 61.24.100. See also RCW 61.24.120.”

United States v. Vallejo, 660 F. Supp. 535 (W.D. Wash. 1987). “Under Washington law, a creditor who holds a deed of trust as security for a loan can use either judicial or non-judicial procedures to enforce the security, but the remedies available to a creditor using non-judicial procedures are limited to foreclosure alone.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.