Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 64.06.050 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The seller shall not be liable for any error, inaccuracy, or omission in the real property transfer disclosure statement if the seller had no actual knowledge of the error, inaccuracy, or omission. Unless the seller has actual knowledge of an error, inaccuracy, or omission in a real property transfer disclosure statement, the seller shall not be liable for such error, inaccuracy, or omission if the disclosure was based on information provided by public agencies, or by other persons providing information within the scope of their professional license or expertise, including, but not limited to, a report or opinion delivered by a land surveyor, title company, title insurance company, structural inspector, pest inspector, licensed engineer, or contractor.

(2) Any real estate licensee involved in a real property transaction is not liable for any error, inaccuracy, or omission in the real property transfer disclosure statement if the licensee had no actual knowledge of the error, inaccuracy, or omission. Unless the licensee has actual knowledge of an error, inaccuracy, or omission in a real property transfer disclosure statement, the licensee shall not be liable for such error, inaccuracy, or omission if the disclosure was based on information provided by public agencies, or by other persons providing information within the scope of their professional license or expertise, including, but not limited to, a report or opinion delivered by a land surveyor, title company, title insurance company, structural inspector, pest inspector, licensed engineer, or contractor.

[ 2010 c 64 s 6; 1996 c 301 s 5; 1994 c 200 s 6.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: Jackowski v. Borchelt, 278 P.3d 1100 (Wash. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jackowski v. Borchelt, 278 P.3d 1100 (Wash. 2012). · cites it 4× “070 states: Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract; nor…”

Svendsen v. Stock, 23 P.3d 455 (Wash. 2001). · cites it 3× “That statute provides: *556 Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute,…”

Svendsen v. Stock, 23 P.3d 455 (Wash. 2001). · cites it 3× “050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract; nor shall anything in this chapter create any…”

Jackowski v. Borchelt, 151 Wash. App. 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “070 provides: Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract;…”

James Brooks v. John E. Nord, 480 P.3d 1167 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “The trial court denied Nord’s motion for fees, reasoning that because Brooks’s action was based on 3 RCW 64.06.050 provides that a seller of real property is not liable for any error, inaccuracy, or omission in the disclosure statement unless the seller had actual knowledge of…”

Jackowski v. Borchelt, 209 P.3d 514 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “070 provides: Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract;…”

Svendsen v. Stock, 979 P.2d 476 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “RCW 64.06.050 (2). Here, however, the only information Edwards had that the problem might have been corrected came from the neighbors, who told her that the county had cleared an obstruction from the pipe in 1994, and from the Stocks themselves, who told her that the problem had…”

Noel Moon v. William Barr, et ux (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “Buyer acknowledges that, pursuant to RCW 64.06.050(2), real estate licensees are not liable for inaccurate information provided by Seller, except to the extent that the real estate licensees know of such inaccurate information.”

Richard Nau, V Nancy K. Vogel As Tr. For Mark O Vogel (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “C Buyer acknowledges that, pursuant to RCW 64.06.050(2), real estate licensees are not liable for inaccurate information provided by Seller, except to the extent that real estate licensees know of such inaccurate information.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.06.050(1) — 1 case

Jackowski v. Borchelt, 278 P.3d 1100 (Wash. 2012). “070 states: Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract; nor…”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.06.050(2) — 5 cases

Svendsen v. Stock, 23 P.3d 455 (Wash. 2001). “That statute provides: *556 Except as provided in RCW 64.06.050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute,…”

Svendsen v. Stock, 23 P.3d 455 (Wash. 2001). “050, nothing in this chapter shall extinguish or impair any rights or remedies of a buyer of real estate against the seller or against any agent acting for the seller otherwise existing pursuant to common law, statute, or contract; nor shall anything in this chapter create any…”

Svendsen v. Stock, 979 P.2d 476 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “RCW 64.06.050 (2). Here, however, the only information Edwards had that the problem might have been corrected came from the neighbors, who told her that the county had cleared an obstruction from the pipe in 1994, and from the Stocks themselves, who told her that the problem had…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.