Wash. Rev. Code » Title 64 · Chapter 64.32

Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The declaration shall contain the following:
(1) A description of the land on which the building and improvement are or are to be located;
(2) A description of the building, stating the number of stories and basements, the number of apartments and the principal materials of which it is or is to be constructed;
(3) The apartment number of each apartment, and a statement of its location, approximate area, number of rooms, and immediate common area to which it has access, and any other data necessary for its proper identification;
(4) A description of the common areas and facilities;
(5) A description of the limited common areas and facilities, if any, stating to which apartments their use is reserved;
(6) The value of the property and of each apartment, and the percentage of undivided interest in the common areas and facilities appertaining to each apartment and its owner for all purposes, including voting;
(7) A statement of the purposes for which the building and each of the apartments are intended and restricted as to use;
(8) The name of a person to receive service of process in the cases provided for in this chapter, together with a residence or place of business of such person which shall be within the county in which the building is located;
(9) A provision as to the percentage of votes by the apartment owners which shall be determinative of whether to rebuild, repair, restore, or sell the property in event of damage or destruction of all or part of the property;
(10) A provision authorizing and establishing procedures for the subdividing and/or combining of any apartment or apartments, common areas and facilities or limited common areas and facilities, which procedures may provide for the accomplishment thereof through means of a metes and bounds description;
(11) A provision requiring the adoption of bylaws for the administration of the property or for other purposes not inconsistent with this chapter, which may include whether administration of the property shall be by a board of directors elected from among the apartment owners, by a manager, or managing agent, or otherwise, and the procedures for the adoption thereof and amendments thereto;
(12) Any further details in connection with the property which the person executing the declaration may deem desirable to set forth consistent with this chapter; and
(13) The method by which the declaration may be amended, consistent with this chapter: PROVIDED, That not less than sixty percent of the apartment owners shall consent to any amendment except that any amendment altering the value of the property and of each apartment and the percentage of undivided interest in the common areas and facilities shall require the unanimous consent of the apartment owners.
[ 1963 c 156 s 9.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash · cites it 30× “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash · cites it 33× “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash · cites it 36× “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri (2000) wash · cites it 4× “” RCW 64.32.090. Amendments to the declaration must be recorded in order to be valid.”
Bogomolov v. LAKE VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N (2006) washctapp · cites it 4× “Section 28 of the Declaration, as well as RCW 64.32.090(13), requires unanimous consent of all Lake Villas Condominium apartment unit owners for the proposed dock expansion.”
Newport Yacht Basin v. Supreme Northwest (2012) washctapp “RCW 64.32.090(4). However, Seattle Boat points to no authority indicating that the failure of a declaration to properly reflect the acquisition of such property actually limits the validity of the property's conveyance.”
Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc. (2012) washctapp “RCW 64.32.090(4). However, Seattle Boat points to no authority indicating that the failure of a declaration to properly reflect the acquisition of such property actually limits the validity of the property’s conveyance.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2007) washctapp · cites it 4× “The declaration provision permitting combinations and subdivisions and its governing authority, RCW 64.32.090(10), 21 allow for subdividing apartments, combining apartments with apartments, or combining common areas with other common areas, all of which cause no net difference…”
Bogomolov v. Lake Villas Condominium Ass'n of Apartment Owners (2006) washctapp · cites it 4× “Section 28 of the Declaration, as well as RCW 64.32.090(13), requires unanimous consent of all Lake Villas Condominium apartment unit owners for the proposed dock expansion.”
Filmore LLLP v. Unit Owners Ass'n (2014) washctapp “The court concluded that “one should read ‘use’ in RCW 64.32.090(7) to mean all uses and not just general categories of use such as residential use or *350 commercial use.”
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri (1998) washctapp “RCW 64.32.090. All owners “shall be subject to this chapter and to the declaration and bylaws,” and decisions by the Association “under the provisions of this chapter, the declaration, or the bylaws .”
McLendon v. Snowblaze Recreational Club Owners Ass'n (1997) washctapp · cites it 3× “” But RCW 64.32.090(10) requires that a condominium declaration contain "[a] provision authorizing and establishing procedures for the subdividing and/or combining of any apartment or apartments, common areas and facilities or limited common areas and facilities .”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(10) — 6 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2007) washctapp “The declaration provision permitting combinations and subdivisions and its governing authority, RCW 64.32.090(10), 21 allow for subdividing apartments, combining apartments with apartments, or combining common areas with other common areas, all of which cause no net difference…”
McLendon v. Snowblaze Recreational Club Owners Ass'n (1997) washctapp “” But RCW 64.32.090(10) requires that a condominium declaration contain "[a] provision authorizing and establishing procedures for the subdividing and/or combining of any apartment or apartments, common areas and facilities or limited common areas and facilities .”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(11) — 3 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(12) — 3 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(13) — 14 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Bogomolov v. LAKE VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N (2006) washctapp “Section 28 of the Declaration, as well as RCW 64.32.090(13), requires unanimous consent of all Lake Villas Condominium apartment unit owners for the proposed dock expansion.”
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri (2000) wash “” RCW 64.32.090. Amendments to the declaration must be recorded in order to be valid.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(2) — 3 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(3) — 3 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(4) — 5 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Newport Yacht Basin v. Supreme Northwest (2012) washctapp “RCW 64.32.090(4). However, Seattle Boat points to no authority indicating that the failure of a declaration to properly reflect the acquisition of such property actually limits the validity of the property's conveyance.”
Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc. (2012) washctapp “RCW 64.32.090(4). However, Seattle Boat points to no authority indicating that the failure of a declaration to properly reflect the acquisition of such property actually limits the validity of the property’s conveyance.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(5) — 3 cases
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “” RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with *524 one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n (2010) wash “" RCW 64.32.090(10). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 9 The Woodcreek apartments were developed in several different styles, some built with two stories and others with one.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.090(7) — 4 cases
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri (2000) wash “” RCW 64.32.090. Amendments to the declaration must be recorded in order to be valid.”
Filmore LLLP v. Unit Owners Ass'n (2014) washctapp “The court concluded that “one should read ‘use’ in RCW 64.32.090(7) to mean all uses and not just general categories of use such as residential use or *350 commercial use.”
Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. Sadri (2000) wash
Filmore, Lllp, Res. v. Unit Owners Association Of Centre Pointe Condominium (2014) washctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.