Wash. Rev. Code » Title 69 · Chapter 69.51A
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 69.51A.055 (2026)

Limitations of chapter—Persons under supervision

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1)(a) The arrest and prosecution protections established in RCW 69.51A.040 may not be asserted in a supervision revocation or violation hearing by a person who is supervised by a corrections agency or department, including local governments or jails, that has determined that the terms of this section are inconsistent with and contrary to his or her supervision.
(b) The affirmative defense established in RCW 69.51A.045 may not be asserted in a supervision revocation or violation hearing by a person who is supervised by a corrections agency or department, including local governments or jails, that has determined that the terms of this section are inconsistent with and contrary to his or her supervision.
(2) RCW 69.51A.040 does not apply to a person who is supervised for a criminal conviction by a corrections agency or department, including local governments or jails, that has determined that the terms of this chapter are inconsistent with and contrary to his or her supervision.
[ 2023 c 254 s 2; 2015 c 70 s 30; 2011 c 181 s 1105.]

Notes:

Short title—Findings—Intent—References to Washington state liquor control board—Draft legislation—2015 c 70: See notes following RCW 66.08.012.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2025 · leading case: State Of Washington v. Anthony G. Houck, 446 P.3d 646 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Of Washington v. Anthony G. Houck, 446 P.3d 646 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 7× “005(4) (2011) and RCW 69.51A.055(1) limit this protection. The statutes provide in relevant part, The arrest and prosecution protections established in RCW 69.”
Pers. Restraint Petition Of: Peter Daniel Ansell (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “RCW 69.51A.055. 19 RCW 9.95.0001(3) (using RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, V. Paul Thomas Clark (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “3d 646 (2019); see also RCW 69.51A.055(1)(a). We agree with Houck.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.51A.055(1) — 1 case
State Of Washington v. Anthony G. Houck, 446 P.3d 646 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “005(4) (2011) and RCW 69.51A.055(1) limit this protection. The statutes provide in relevant part, The arrest and prosecution protections established in RCW 69.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.51A.055(1)(a) — 2 cases
State Of Washington v. Anthony G. Houck, 446 P.3d 646 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “005(4) (2011) and RCW 69.51A.055(1) limit this protection. The statutes provide in relevant part, The arrest and prosecution protections established in RCW 69.”
State Of Washington, V. Paul Thomas Clark (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “3d 646 (2019); see also RCW 69.51A.055(1)(a). We agree with Houck.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.