Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.16
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.070 (2026)

Contents of writ

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The writ of review must command the party to whom it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ, at a specified time and place, a transcript of the record and proceedings (describing or referring to them with convenient certainty), that the same may be reviewed by the court, and requiring the party, in the meantime, to desist from further proceedings in the matter to be reviewed.
[ 1895 c 65 s 7; RRS s 1005.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1968–2010 · leading case: JJR INC. v. City of Seattle, 891 P.2d 720 (Wash. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
JJR INC. v. City of Seattle, 891 P.2d 720 (Wash. 1995). · cites it 3× “Seattle argues that the writ of review under RCW 7.”
Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish Cnty., 829 P.2d 746 (Wash. 1992). “RCW 7.16.070. Therefore, the County argues, it did not have an opportunity nor any incentive to present its arguments relative to monetary liability to Judge Kershner.”
Parkridge v. City of Seattle, 573 P.2d 359 (Wash. 1978). “RCW 7.16.070. See Beach v. Board of Adjustment, 73 Wn.”
State Dept. of Corr. v. City of Kennewick, 937 P.2d 1119 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “" DOC sought review in superior court on a writ of certiorari, pursuant to RCW 7.16.070. The City of Kennewick moved to dismiss.”
D.C.R. Ent., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 778 P.2d 1060 (Wash. Ct. App. 1989). “160; RCW 7.16.070; Bock v. Board of Pilotage Comm'rs, 91 Wn.”
Beach v. Bd. of Adjustment of Snohomish Cty., 438 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1968). “RCW 7.16.070 provides: The writ of review must command the party to whom it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ .”
Beach v. Bd. of Adjustment, 438 P.2d 617 (Wash. 1968). “RCW 7.16.070 provides: The writ of review must command the party to whom it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ .”
Dep't of Corr. v. City of Kennewick, 937 P.2d 1119 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “” DOC sought review in superior court on a writ of certiorari, pursuant to RCW 7.16.070. The City of Kennewick *529 moved to dismiss.”
Burman v. State, 749 P.2d 708 (Wash. Ct. App. 1988). “See RCW 7.16.070. After hearing the parties, the reviewing court may give judgment, either affirming or annulling or modifying the proceedings below.”
Bennett v. Bd. of Adjustment, 597 P.2d 939 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “The property owners contend that when a *700 decision of the Board is appealed to superior court that the Board is required to transcribe and provide the reviewing trial court with a verbatim written record of the Board's proceedings.”
Puget Sound Med. Supply v. Dshs, 234 P.3d 246 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “[6] The two statutes were RCW 7.16.070 and RCW 36.70.900. RCW 7.16.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.