Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.110 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the return of the writ be defective, the court may order a further return to be made. When a full return has been made, the court must hear the parties, or such of them as may attend for that purpose, and may thereupon give judgment, either affirming or annulling or modifying the proceedings below.

[ 1895 c 65 s 11; RRS s 1009.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1992 · leading case: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish Cnty., 829 P.2d 746 (Wash. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish Cnty., 829 P.2d 746 (Wash. 1992). “Moreover, while the County may not have been able to supplement the administrative record in the certiorari action, it did have the opportunity to argue its case to the judge, RCW 7.16.110, an opportunity of which it took full advantage.”

Burman v. State, 749 P.2d 708 (Wash. Ct. App. 1988). “See RCW 7.16.110. Burman's complaint did seek, in the alternative, a writ of certiorari, using the required form.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.