Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.150
Mandamus defined
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The writ of mandamus may be denominated a writ of mandate.
[ 1895 c 65 s 15; RRS s 1013.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1953–1994 · leading case: Walker v. Munro
Walker v. Munro (1994)
“2(a); RCW 7.16.150 *407 et seq. (governing mandamus proceedings); and RCW 7.”
Cox v. City of Lynnwood (1993)
“The Coxes' complaint stated four causes of action, one requesting the court issue a writ of mandamus to compel Lynnwood to approve the BLA under RCW 7.16.150 et seq. and another requesting damages under RCW 64.”
State Ex Rel. Bond v. State (1962)
“State ex rel. Ford v. King Cy., supra ; State ex rel.”
State Ex Rel. Schoblom v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc. (1953)
“If we had section 8 only to consider, I would be of the opinion that our statutory mandamus RCW 7.16.150 and 7.16.160 would be available to appellant to compel the corporation to accord to him the right given by section 8 of the by-laws.”
City of Pasco v. Napier (1987)
“RCW 7.16.150 et seq. The next issue raised is whether Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.