Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.21.070 (2026)

Appellate review

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A party in a proceeding or action under this chapter may seek appellate review under applicable court rules. Appellate review does not stay the proceedings in any other action, suit, or proceeding, or any judgment, decree, or order in the action, suit, or proceeding to which the contempt relates.

[ 1989 c 373 s 7.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2020 · leading case: Diaz v. Washington State Migrant Council, 265 P.3d 956 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Diaz v. Washington State Migrant Council, 265 P.3d 956 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “¶15 The Migrant Council sought interlocutory review, asking this court to determine that the trial court’s order finding contempt and imposing sanctions was appealable as a matter of right under RCW 7.21.070. 4 It sought discretionary review under RAP 2.”

Seattle Nw. Sec. Corp. v. SDG Holding Co., 812 P.2d 488 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991). “Before we examine the issues of attorney-client privilege, however, we first address respondent's contention that a civil contempt proceeding is not appealable, or at least not appealable on these grounds.”

Michael F. Cronin v. Cent. Valley Sch. Dist. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “RCW 7.21.070 provides in part: “Appellate review does not stay the .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.