Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.24.140 (2026)

General purpose stated

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact it, and to harmonize, as far as possible, with federal laws and regulations on the subject of declaratory judgments and decrees.

[ 1935 c 113 s 15; RRS s 784-15.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1983 · leading case: United Nursing Homes, Inc. v. McNutt, 669 P.2d 476 (Wash. Ct. App. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United Nursing Homes, Inc. v. McNutt, 669 P.2d 476 (Wash. Ct. App. 1983). “See RCW 7.24.140. The trial court has authority to order DSHS to comply with former RCW 74.”

Blakely v. Hous. Auth., 505 P.2d 151 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973). “The general rule is that a clause prohibiting pets in premises leased is a valid clause. A tenant who violates such a clause after the giving of the required notice is guilty of unlawful detainer.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.