Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.60
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.60.070 (2026)

Turnover of property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon demand by a receiver appointed under this chapter, any person shall turn over any property over which the receiver has been appointed that is within the possession or control of that person unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause shown. A receiver by motion may seek to compel turnover of estate property unless there exists a bona fide dispute with respect to the existence or nature of the receiver's interest in the property, in which case turnover shall be sought by means of an action under RCW 7.60.160. In the absence of a bona fide dispute with respect to the receiver's right to possession of estate property, the failure to relinquish possession and control to the receiver shall be punishable as a contempt of the court.
[ 2004 c 165 s 9.]

Notes:

Purpose—Captions not law—2004 c 165: See notes following RCW 7.60.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: In The Receivership Of: Applied Restoration, Inc. (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In The Receivership Of: Applied Restoration, Inc. (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 6× “RCW 7.60.070. Roughly two weeks later, the owner issued payment to Andersen for work ARI had completed in April 2020.”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “160 instead of moving for turnover pursuant to RCW 7.60.070. We disagree. Under RCW 7.60.”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “160 instead of moving for turnover pursuant to RCW 7.60.070. We disagree. Under RCW 7.60.”
Johanna Grider v. Christopher Quinn (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “RCW 7.60.070. Although the court could not appoint Johanna Grider as the receiver, the court saved the parties the expense of a receiver by declaring Grider to control the operations of the North Spokane outlet and ruling the marijuana license to be an asset of the partnership…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.