Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 7.60.210 (2026)
Submission of claims in general receiverships
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) All claims, whether contingent, liquidated, unliquidated, or disputed, other than claims of creditors with security interests in or other liens against property of the estate, arising prior to the receiver's appointment, must be served in accordance with this chapter, and any claim not so filed is barred from participating in any distribution to creditors in any general receivership.
(2) Claims must be served by delivering the claim to the general receiver within thirty days from the date notice is given by mail under this section, unless the court reduces or extends the period for cause shown, except that a claim arising from the rejection of an executory contract or an unexpired lease of the person over whose property the receiver is appointed may be filed within thirty days after the rejection. Claims need not be filed. Claims must be served by state agencies on the general receiver within one hundred eighty days from the date notice is given by mail under this section.
(3) Claims must be in written form entitled "Proof of Claim," setting forth the name and address of the creditor and the nature and amount of the claim, and executed by the creditor or the creditor's authorized agent. When a claim, or an interest in estate property of securing the claim, is based on a writing, the original or a copy of the writing must be included as a part of the proof of claim, together with evidence of perfection of any security interest or other lien asserted by the claimant.
(4) A claim, executed and served in accordance with this section, constitutes prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim.
[ 2004 c 165 s 23.]
Notes:
Purpose—Captions not law—2004 c 165: See notes following RCW 7.60.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: Per & Melody Westerdal v. Name Intelligence, Inc., 195 Wash. App. 170 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
Per & Melody Westerdal v. Name Intelligence, Inc., 195 Wash. App. 170 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The trial court could reasonably decide that other procedural obstacles under the receivership statute counter these advantages: Jay has reserved the argument that the claim was time barred under RCW 7.60.210, to which Per and Melody’s only defense is their unsupported statement…”
Constr. Loan Servs. Ii, Llc, V. Ecm Riverside Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “59088-3-II a general receiver’s rejection of it shall be served upon the receiver in the manner provided for by RCW 7.60.210 within thirty days following the rejection.”
In The Receivership Of: Applied Restoration, Inc. (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “Such a rejection “shall be treated as a breach of the contract or lease occurring immediately prior to the receiver’s appointment” and any claim of a party to the contract or lease, based on the receiver’s rejection of it, “shall be served upon the receiver in the manner…”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Pursuant to RCW 7.60.210(1), all claims of unsecured creditors “arising prior to the receiver’s appointment, must be served in accordance with this chapter, and any claim not so filed is barred from participating in any distribution to creditors in any general receivership.”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Pursuant to RCW 7.60.210(1), all claims of unsecured creditors “arising prior to the receiver’s appointment, must be served in accordance with this chapter, and any claim not so filed is barred from participating in any distribution to creditors in any general receivership.”
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. Washington Square Hotel Holdings, LLC (W.D. Wash. 2022). “” See RCW 7.60.210(1). By the same token, the only claims 5 for which Vandervert could have faced liability were those filed in the receivership 6 proceeding.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.60.210(1) — 4 cases
Constr. Loan Servs. Ii, Llc, V. Ecm Riverside Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “59088-3-II a general receiver’s rejection of it shall be served upon the receiver in the manner provided for by RCW 7.60.210 within thirty days following the rejection.”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Pursuant to RCW 7.60.210(1), all claims of unsecured creditors “arising prior to the receiver’s appointment, must be served in accordance with this chapter, and any claim not so filed is barred from participating in any distribution to creditors in any general receivership.”
In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Pursuant to RCW 7.60.210(1), all claims of unsecured creditors “arising prior to the receiver’s appointment, must be served in accordance with this chapter, and any claim not so filed is barred from participating in any distribution to creditors in any general receivership.”
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. Washington Square Hotel Holdings, LLC (W.D. Wash. 2022). “” See RCW 7.60.210(1). By the same token, the only claims 5 for which Vandervert could have faced liability were those filed in the receivership 6 proceeding.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.60.210(3) — 1 case
Constr. Loan Servs. Ii, Llc, V. Ecm Riverside Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “59088-3-II a general receiver’s rejection of it shall be served upon the receiver in the manner provided for by RCW 7.60.210 within thirty days following the rejection.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.60.210(4) — 2 cases
Per & Melody Westerdal v. Name Intelligence, Inc., 195 Wash. App. 170 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The trial court could reasonably decide that other procedural obstacles under the receivership statute counter these advantages: Jay has reserved the argument that the claim was time barred under RCW 7.60.210, to which Per and Melody’s only defense is their unsupported statement…”
Constr. Loan Servs. Ii, Llc, V. Ecm Riverside Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “59088-3-II a general receiver’s rejection of it shall be served upon the receiver in the manner provided for by RCW 7.60.210 within thirty days following the rejection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.