Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 7.64.010 (2026)
Plaintiff may claim and obtain immediate delivery
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The plaintiff in an action to recover the possession of personal property may claim and obtain the immediate delivery of such property, after a hearing, as provided in this chapter.
The remedies provided under this chapter are in addition to any other remedy available to the plaintiff, including a secured creditor's right of self-help repossession.
[ 1990 c 227 s 1; 1979 ex.s. c 132 s 1; Code 1881 s 142; 1877 p 30 s 142; 1869 p 35 s 140; 1854 p 150 s 100; RRS s 707.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Seiu Healthcare Nw Training P'ship v. Evergreen Freedom Found., 427 P.3d 688 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
Seiu Healthcare Nw Training P'ship v. Evergreen Freedom Found., 427 P.3d 688 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “" RCW 7.64.010. As the result of an amendment in 1979, the plaintiff must first apply for an order directing the defendant to appear and show cause why the court should not issue an order putting the plaintiff in possession of the personal property.”
Dimension Funding, LLC v. D.K. Assocs., Inc., 146 Wash. App. 653 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “RCW 7.64.010 governs replevin actions. But the original owner may also retrieve property obtained by “larceny, robbery or burglary” under RCW 10.”
Hensrude v. Sloss, 209 P.3d 543 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “A person buys goods in the ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller's own usual or customary practices.”
Dimension Funding, LLC v. Dk Assocs., Inc., 191 P.3d 923 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “RCW 7.64.010 governs replevin actions. But the original owner may also retrieve property obtained by "larceny, robbery or burglary" under RCW 10.”
Hensrude v. Sloss, 150 Wash. App. 853 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “A person buys goods in the ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller’s own usual or customary practices.”
Hatley v. Mullan (W.D. Wash. 2021). “]”1 RCW 7.64.010. The plaintiff must apply to the Court “to issue an order 4 directing the defendant to appear and show cause why an order putting the plaintiff in immediate 5 possession of the personal property should not be issued.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.