Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 70.160.030 (2026)

Smoking prohibited in public places or places of employment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No person may smoke in a public place or in any place of employment.
[ 2006 c 2 s 3 (Initiative Measure No. 901, approved November 8, 2005); 1985 c 236 s 3.]

Notes:

Captions not law2006 c 2 (Initiative Measure No. 901): See note following RCW 70.160.011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2005–2015 · leading case: Am. Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTH, 192 P.3d 306 (Wash. 2008).
Am. Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTH, 192 P.3d 306 (Wash. 2008). · cites it 13× “" RCW 70.160.030,.020(3) (defining a "`[p]lace of employment'").”
Am. Legion Post No. 149 v. Dep't of Health, 164 Wash. 2d 570 (Wash. 2008). · cites it 13× “” RCW 70.160.030, .020(3) (defining a “ ‘[p]lace of employment’ ”).”
Ass'n of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 340 P.3d 849 (Wash. 2015). “(citing RCW 70.160.030). *362 We therefore characterized the right at issue as “[s]moking inside a place of employment” and found that there was no constitutional privilege involved.”
Utter v. Bldg. Indus. Ass'n, 310 P.3d 829 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “at 582 (quoting RCW 70.160.030 and citing .020(3)). Chapter 70.”
Ent. Indus. Coalition v. Tacoma-Pierce Cnty. Health Dep't, 105 P.3d 985 (Wash. 2005). “RCW 70.160.030 states that “No person may smoke in a public place except in designated smoking areas.”
EIC v. Tacoma-Pierce Cnty. Health Dept., 105 P.3d 985 (Wash. 2005). “RCW 70.160.030 states that "No person may smoke in a public place except in designated smoking areas.”
Robert F. Utter & Faith Ireland, App./x-resp. v. Bldg. Indus. Assoc. Of Wa, Resp./x-app. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “at 582 (citing RCW 70.160.030, .020(3)). Chapter 70.160 RCW is now entitled the smoking in public places act.”
Ass'n of Wash. Spirits & Wine Distribs. v. Liquor Control Bd. (Wash. 2015). “(citing RCW 70.160.030). We therefore characterized the right at issue as "[s]moking inside a place of employment" and found that there was no constitutional privilege involved.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.