Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.030 (2026)

Prohibition on private incarceration

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, no person, business, or state or local governmental entity shall operate a private detention facility within the state or utilize a contract with a private detention facility within the state. No state or local governmental entity shall utilize a contract with a private detention facility outside of Washington state, except as provided in RCW 72.68.010(2).
(2) A private detention facility that is operating pursuant to a valid contract with a governmental entity that was in effect prior to January 1, 2021, may remain in operation for the duration of that contract, not to include any extensions or modifications made to, or authorized by, that contract.
(3) In accordance with the legislative findings in RCW 70.395.010, this section does not apply if the involuntary confinement is at:
(a) A facility providing rehabilitative, counseling, treatment, mental health, educational, or medical services to juveniles who are subject to Title 13 RCW, or similarly applicable federal law;
(b) A facility providing evaluation and treatment or forensic services to a person who has been civilly detained or is subject to an order of commitment by a court pursuant to chapter 10.77, 71.05, 71.09, or 71.34 RCW, or similarly applicable federal law;
(c) A facility used for the quarantine or isolation of persons for public health reasons pursuant to RCW 43.20.050, or similarly applicable federal law;
(d) A facility used for work release under chapter 72.65 RCW, or similarly applicable federal law;
(e) A facility used for extraordinary medical placement;
(f) A facility used for residential substance use disorder treatment;
(g) A facility used to house persons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4013; or
(h) A facility owned and operated by federally recognized tribes and contracting with a government.
[ 2021 c 30 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2023–2026 · leading case: GEO Grp. Inc v. Inslee (W.D. Wash. 2023).
GEO Grp. Inc v. Inslee (W.D. Wash. 2023). · cites it 15× “GEO seeks a 2 judgment declaring that RCW 70.395.030—a statute that generally prohibits the 3 operation of private detention facilities in Washington—is unconstitutional as applied to 4 GEO in its operation of the NWIPC or any other detention facilities that it may operate 5 for…”
The GEO Grp. Inc v. Inslee (W.D. Wash. 2024). · cites it 4× “In 2021, the Washington legislature passed Engrossed House Bill (EHB) 1090 15 (codified as RCW 70.395.030), which generally provides that “no person, business, or 16 state or local governmental entity shall operate a private detention facility within the state 17 or utilize a…”
Ugochukwu Nwauzor v. the Geo Grp., Inc. (9th Cir. 2025). “” See Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.030 . Armed with this law, Washington tried to shut down the Northwest Detention Center.”
The Geo Grp., Inc. v. Inslee (9th Cir. 2025). “” Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.030 . After our court’s en banc decision in GEO Group, Inc.”
Clifton Bell, V. Washington State Dept. Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “See RCW 70.395.030 (making it illegal, with some exceptions, to operate a private detention facility in Washington but permitting existing contracts for such prisons to continue until their set expiration dates).”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.030(3)(a) — 1 case
The GEO Grp. Inc v. Inslee (W.D. Wash. 2024). “In 2021, the Washington legislature passed Engrossed House Bill (EHB) 1090 15 (codified as RCW 70.395.030), which generally provides that “no person, business, or 16 state or local governmental entity shall operate a private detention facility within the state 17 or utilize a…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.030(3)(g) — 1 case
The GEO Grp. Inc v. Inslee (W.D. Wash. 2024). “In 2021, the Washington legislature passed Engrossed House Bill (EHB) 1090 15 (codified as RCW 70.395.030), which generally provides that “no person, business, or 16 state or local governmental entity shall operate a private detention facility within the state 17 or utilize a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.