Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 71.05.025 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature intends that the procedures and services authorized in this chapter be integrated with those in chapter 71.24 RCW to the maximum extent necessary to assure an appropriate continuum of care for persons with behavioral health disorders, as defined in either or both this chapter and chapter 71.24 RCW. To this end, behavioral health administrative services organizations established in accordance with chapter 71.24 RCW shall institute procedures which require timely consultation with resource management services by designated crisis responders, managed care organizations, evaluation and treatment facilities, secure withdrawal management and stabilization facilities, and approved substance use disorder treatment programs to assure that determinations to admit, detain, commit, treat, discharge, or release persons with behavioral health disorders under this chapter are made only after appropriate information regarding such person's treatment history and current treatment plan has been sought from resource management services.
[ 2020 c 302 s 5; 2019 c 325 s 3002; 2016 sp.s. c 29 s 205; 2014 c 225 s 80; 2000 c 94 s 2; 1989 c 205 s 9.]

Notes:

Effective date2019 c 325: See note following RCW 71.24.011.
Effective dates2016 sp.s. c 29: See note following RCW 71.05.760.
Short titleRight of action2016 sp.s. c 29: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.
Effective date2014 c 225: See note following RCW 71.24.016.
Evaluation of transition to regional systems1989 c 205: See note following RCW 71.24.015.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: Pierce Cnty. v. State, 185 P.3d 594 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 185 P.3d 594 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “RCW 71.05.025, .150(1)(a). If a county designated mental health professional [2] employed by the regional support network concludes that the allegations are true and the person will not voluntarily seek treatment, the mental health professional seeks an order from the superior…”
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 144 Wash. App. 783 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “320(1), arguing that this provision of the Involuntary Treatment Act must be harmonized with provisions of the Community Mental Health Services Act, as RCW 71.05.025 provides. This statute explains that “[t]he legislature intends that the procedures and services authorized in…”
Matter of Det. of Rr, 895 P.2d 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995). “See also RCW 71.05.025, .050, .120, .150, .160, .170, .”
In Re The Det. Of: M.y. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “2d at 208 (quoting RCW 71.05.025(b)). This evidence must include recent proof of significant loss of cognitive or volitional control.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 71.05.025(b) — 1 case
In Re The Det. Of: M.y. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “2d at 208 (quoting RCW 71.05.025(b)). This evidence must include recent proof of significant loss of cognitive or volitional control.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.