Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 72.09.580 (2026)

Offender records and reports

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as specifically prohibited by other law, and for purposes of determining, modifying, or monitoring compliance with conditions of community custody, the department:

(1) Shall have access to all relevant records and information in the possession of public agencies relating to offenders, including police reports, prosecutors' statements of probable cause, complete criminal history information, psychological evaluations and psychiatric hospital reports, sex offender treatment program reports, and juvenile records; and

(2) May require periodic reports from providers of treatment or other services required by the court or the department, including progress reports, evaluations and assessments, and reports of violations of conditions imposed by the court or the department.

[ 2008 c 231 s 50; 1999 c 196 s 12.]

Notes:

Intent—Application—Application of repealers—Effective date—2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.

Severability—2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.

Construction—Short title—1999 c 196: See RCW 72.09.904 and 72.09.905.

Severability—1999 c 196: See note following RCW 9.94A.010.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: State Of Washington v. Sallyea Mcclinton, 448 P.3d 101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State Of Washington v. Sallyea Mcclinton, 448 P.3d 101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “The legislature reaffirmed its intent that the provisions in statutes like RCW 9.94B.040 be a supplement to the SRA. j~ C.”

State of Washington v. Oda Roy Chartier (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “He also filed a Statement of Additional Grounds (SAG) in which he claims that he was "falsely sentenced under the Indeterminate Sentencing Board," and should have been sentenced under the Offender Accountability Act, RCW 72.09.580, .590, .904. A motion for relief from judgment…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.