Wash. Rev. Code § 74.09.200
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature finds and declares it to be in the public interest and for the protection of the health and welfare of the residents of the state of Washington that a proper regulatory and inspection program be instituted in connection with the providing of medical, dental, and other health services to recipients of public assistance and medically indigent persons. In order to effectively accomplish such purpose and to assure that the recipient of such services receives such services as are paid for by the state of Washington, the acceptance by the recipient of such services, and by practitioners of reimbursement for performing such services, shall authorize the secretary or director, to inspect and audit all records in connection with the providing of such services.
Notes:
Effective date—Findings—Intent—Report—Agency transfer—References to head of health care authority—Draft legislation—2011 1st sp.s. c 15: See notes following RCW 74.09.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2023 · leading case: State Of Washington v. Burnice Renee Thompson
State Of Washington v. Burnice Renee Thompson (2016)
“RCW 74.09.200 states, “The legislature finds and declares it to be in the public interest and for the protection of the health and welfare of the residents of the state of Washington that a proper regulatory and inspection program be instituted in connection with the providing…”
Harold Bircumshaw v. State Of Washington, Health Care Authority (2016)
“Former RCW 74.09.200 (1979). Pursuant to this statutory authority, DSHS delegated to the MAA the power to “conduct! ] audits as necessary to identify benefits or payments to which contractor/providers are not entitled.”
Failor's Pharmacy v. Department of Social & Health Services (1994)
“The benefit of the Medicaid program runs to the Medicaid patient, RCW 74.09.200, and its enjoyment is altered by the change in reimbursement rates.”
Allen Dental Laboratories, Inc., App v. Washington State Health Care Authority, Resp (2017)
“15 We examine the provisions in the context of "'the contract as a whole, interpreting particular language in the context of other contract provisions.”
City of Tacoma v. Dep't of Ecology (2023)
“The benefit of the Medicaid program runs to the Medicaid patient, RCW 74.09.200, and its enjoyment is altered by the change in reimbursement rates.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.