Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 74.39A.360 (2026)

Training partnership

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) If the department has any contracts for personal care services with any individual providers represented by an exclusive bargaining representative:

(a) All training and peer mentoring required under this chapter shall be provided by a training partnership;

(b) Contributions to the partnership shall be made under a collective bargaining agreement negotiated under this chapter;

(c) The training partnership shall provide reports as required by the department verifying that all individual providers have complied with all training requirements; and

(d) The exclusive bargaining representative shall designate the training partnership.

(2) When individual providers are employed by a consumer directed employer, funding for training shall be included in the labor rate component paid to the consumer directed employer as determined and funded under RCW 74.39A.530.

[ 2018 c 278 s 25; 2007 c 361 s 6.]

Notes:

Findings—Intent—2018 c 278: See note following RCW 74.39A.500.

Construction—Severability—Captions not law—Short title—2007 c 361: See notes following RCW 74.39A.009.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Freedom Found., App. v. Seiu Healthcare Nw Training P'ship, Res. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Freedom Found., App. v. Seiu Healthcare Nw Training P'ship, Res. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 7× “Former RCW 74.39A.360 (2007). Beginning January 1, 2010,for individual providers represented by an exclusive bargaining representative under RCW 74.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 74.39A.360(1)(c) — 1 case

Freedom Found., App. v. Seiu Healthcare Nw Training P'ship, Res. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “Former RCW 74.39A.360 (2007). Beginning January 1, 2010,for individual providers represented by an exclusive bargaining representative under RCW 74.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.