Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 77.75.010 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
There exists between the states of Washington and Oregon a definite compact and agreement as follows:
All laws and regulations now existing or which may be necessary for regulating, protecting or preserving fish in the waters of the Columbia river, or its tributaries, over which the states of Washington and Oregon have concurrent jurisdiction, or which would be affected by said concurrent jurisdiction, shall be made, changed, altered and amended in whole or in part, only with the mutual consent and approbation of both states.
[ 1983 1st ex.s. c 46 s 149; 1955 c 12 s 75.40.010. Prior: 1949 c 112 s 80; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 5780-701. Formerly RCW 75.40.010.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: Robert Sudar v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 347 P.3d 1090 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
Robert Sudar v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 347 P.3d 1090 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “RCW 77.75.010, .020. In keeping with customary usage, “compact” is also used in this opinion to refer to Washington and Oregon agency directors or their representatives acting on behalf of their respective Fish and Wildlife Commissions in the administration of this agreement.”
Colbert v. Pac. States Marine Fisheries Com'n, 104 P.3d 17 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “2d 1211 ; RCW 77.75.010; Act of Apr. 8, 1918, Pub.L.”
Colbert v. Pac. States Marine Fisheries Comm'n, 124 Wash. App. 821 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “2d 270 ; RCW 77.75.010; Act of Apr. 8, 1918, Pub. L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.