Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 8.08.080 (2026)
Appellate review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Either party may seek appellate review of the judgment for compensation of the damages awarded in the superior court within thirty days after the entry of judgment as aforesaid, and such review shall bring before the supreme court or the court of appeals the propriety and justice of the amount of damage in respect to the parties to the review: PROVIDED, That upon such review no bonds shall be required: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That if the owner of land, real estate, or premises accepts the sum awarded by the jury or the court, he or she shall be deemed thereby to have waived conclusively appellate review, and final judgment by default may be rendered in the superior court as in other cases.
Notes:
Severability—1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1966–2018 · leading case: King Cnty. v. City of Seattle, 414 P.2d 1016 (Wash. 1966).
King Cnty. v. City of Seattle, 414 P.2d 1016 (Wash. 1966). “010 to RCW 8.08.080. Seattle argues that since these statutes do not delegate specific authority for a county to condemn lands or property belonging to another municipal corporation, King County is without power to do so.”
Joseph Vines, V Pierce Co, Lilliane & Tim Smiley (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “RCW 8.08.080. It does not excuse a condemnee from posting a bond when appealing an order to grant an easement to a third party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.