Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.04.170 (2026)
Review of orders
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any complainant or any public service company affected by any findings or order of the commission, and deeming such findings or order to be contrary to law, may, within thirty days after the service of the findings or order upon him or her or it, apply to the superior court of Thurston county for a writ of review, for the purpose of having the reasonableness and lawfulness of such findings or order inquired into and determined. Such writ shall be made returnable not later than thirty days from and after the date of the issuance thereof, unless upon notice to all parties affected further time be allowed by the court, and shall direct the commission to certify its record in the case to the court. Such cause shall be heard by the court without the intervention of a jury on the evidence and exhibits introduced before the commission and certified to by it. Upon such hearing, the superior court shall enter judgment either affirming or setting aside or remanding for further action the findings or order of the commission under review. The reasonable cost of preparing the transcript of testimony taken before the commission shall be assessable as part of the statutory court costs, and the amount thereof, if collected by the commission, shall be deposited in the public service revolving fund. In case such findings or order be set aside, or reversed and remanded, the court shall make specific findings based upon evidence in the record indicating clearly all respects in which the commission's findings or order are erroneous.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1963–1996 · leading case: Tanner Elec. Coop. v. Puget Sound Power & Light, 911 P.2d 1301 (Wash. 1996).
Tanner Elec. Coop. v. Puget Sound Power & Light, 911 P.2d 1301 (Wash. 1996). “See RCW 80.04.170 (complainant affected by commission order, deeming such order to be contrary to law, may apply for a writ of review); see also State ex rel.”
Elec. Lightwave, Inc. v. Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 869 P.2d 1045 (Wash. 1994). “The Trial Court Properly Awarded Transcript Fees to the Commission Whidbey, GTE, and WITA each initiated suit under RCW 34.”
State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State High. Comm'n, 385 P.2d 376 (Wash. 1963). “075 (footnote 4, supra) provides that judicial review of the commission’s findings shall be considered by the courts in the manner specified in the public service commission law of this state.”
Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 377 P.2d 871 (Wash. 1963). “430; see also RCW 80.04.170 (findings of Commission subject to test of “reasonableness and lawfulness”).”
State Ex Rel. Pac. Nw Bell Tel. Co. v. Wa. U. & T. Com., 403 P.2d 73 (Wash. 1965). “In other words, we review its judgment entered pursuant to RCW 80.04.170, and not the findings and order of the Commission.”
State v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 403 P.2d 73 (Wash. 1965). “In other words, we review its judgment entered pursuant to RCW 80.04.170, and not the findings and order of the Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.