Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.04.190 (2026)
Appellate review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The commission, any public service company or any complainant may, after the entry of judgment in the superior court in any action of review, seek appellate review as in other cases.
[ 1988 c 202 s 60; 1971 ex.s. c 107 s 4; 1961 c 14 s 80.04.190. Prior: 1911 c 117 s 88; RRS s 10430.]
Notes:
Rules of court: Cf. RAP 2.2.
Severability—1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1963–1965 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State High. Comm'n, 385 P.2d 376 (Wash. 1963).
State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State High. Comm'n, 385 P.2d 376 (Wash. 1963). “075 (footnote 4, supra) provides that judicial review of the commission’s findings shall be considered by the courts in the manner specified in the public service commission law of this state.”
State Ex Rel. Pac. Nw Bell Tel. Co. v. Wa. U. & T. Com., 403 P.2d 73 (Wash. 1965). “Nevertheless, in order to perform our function, it is necessary for us to examine the evidence which was before the Commission and its findings and order, because RCW 80.04.190 provides that: The original transcript of the record and testimony filed in the superior court in any…”
State v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 403 P.2d 73 (Wash. 1965). “Nevertheless, in order to perform our function, it is necessary for us to examine the evidence which was before the Commission and its findings and order, because RCW 80.04.190 provides that: The original transcript of the record and testimony filed in the superior court in any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.