Wash. Rev. Code » Title 80 · Chapter 80.28
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 80.28.080 (2026)

Published rates to be charged—Exceptions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1)(a) Except as provided otherwise in this subsection, no gas company, electrical company, wastewater company, water company, or thermal energy company may charge, demand, collect or receive a greater or less or different compensation for any service rendered or to be rendered than the rates and charges applicable to such service as specified in its schedule filed and in effect at the time, nor may any such company directly or indirectly refund or remit in any manner or by any device any portion of the rates or charges so specified, or furnish its product at free or reduced rates except to its employees and their families, and its officers, attorneys, and agents; to hospitals, charitable and eleemosynary institutions and persons engaged in charitable and eleemosynary work; to indigent and destitute persons; to national homes or state homes for disabled volunteer soldiers and soldiers' and sailors' homes.
For the purposes of this subsection (1):
(i) "Employees" includes furloughed, pensioned and superannuated employees, persons who have become disabled or infirm in the service of any such company; and
(ii) "Families" includes the families of those persons named in this proviso, the families of persons killed or dying in the service, also the families of persons killed, and the surviving spouse prior to remarriage, and the minor children during minority of persons who died while in the service of any of the companies named in this subsection (1).
(b) Water companies may furnish free or at reduced rates water for the use of the state, or for any project in which the state is interested.
(c) Gas companies, electrical companies, wastewater companies, water companies, and thermal energy companies may charge the defendant for treble damages awarded in lawsuits successfully litigated under RCW 80.28.240.
(2) No gas company, electrical company, wastewater company, water company, or thermal energy company may extend to any person or corporation any form of contract or agreement or any rule or regulation or any privilege or facility except such as are regularly and uniformly extended to all persons and corporations under like circumstances.
[ 2025 c 263 s 14; 2011 c 214 s 17; 1985 c 427 s 2; 1973 1st ex.s. c 154 s 116; 1961 c 14 s 80.28.080. Prior: 1911 c 117 s 29; RRS s 10365.]

Notes:

Findings—Purpose—Limitation of chapter—Effective date—2011 c 214: See notes following RCW 80.04.010.
Severability—1973 1st ex.s. c 154: See note following RCW 2.12.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2003 · leading case: Okeson v. City of Seattle, 150 Wash. 2d 540 (Wash. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Okeson v. City of Seattle, 150 Wash. 2d 540 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, state law prohibits electric companies from granting undue preferences to cities.”
Okeson v. City of Seattle, 78 P.3d 1279 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “Second, appellants contend that Ordinance 119747 violates RCW 80.28.080. RCW 80.28.080 states that no electric company shall furnish its product at free or reduced rates except to certain specified entities, among which cities are not included.”
Hous. Auth. v. Ne. Lake Washington Sewer & Water Dist., 784 P.2d 1284 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “RCW 80.28.080. RCW Title 80 also prohibits the granting of preferences: No gas company, electrical company or water company shall make or grant any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person, corporation, or locality, or to any particular description of service…”
Nat'l Union Ins. v. Puget Sound Power & Light, 972 P.2d 481 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “RCW 80.28.080. Therefore, the continuity-of-service tariff is not the result of any contractual negotiations between Puget Power and Boeing: Contract law is designed to enforce the expectancy interests created by agreement between private parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.