Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.02.010 (2026)
Definitions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
For the purpose of this title, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
(1) "Cannabis," "cannabis-infused products," and "useable cannabis" have the meanings provided in RCW 69.50.101;
(2) "Department" means the department of revenue of the state of Washington;
(3) "Director" means the director of the department of revenue of the state of Washington;
(4) "Frontier county" means a county with a population density of fewer than 50 persons per square mile as determined by the office of financial management and published each year by the department. A county with a population density of 21 or fewer persons per square mile is a "frontier one" county. A county with a population density of more than 21 but fewer than 50 persons per square mile is a "frontier two" county. Every frontier county is also a rural county as defined in RCW 82.14.370 and eligible for all benefits, services, and programs unless a frontier county is specifically excluded in the authorizing statute;
(5) "Taxpayer" includes any individual, group of individuals, corporation, or association liable for any tax or the collection of any tax hereunder, or who engages in any business or performs any act for which a tax is imposed by this title. "Taxpayer" also includes any person liable for any fee or other charge collected by the department under any provision of law, including registration assessments and delinquency fees imposed under RCW 59.30.050; and
(6) Words in the singular number include the plural and the plural include the singular. Words in one gender include all other genders.
[ 2024 c 47 s 3; 2022 c 16 s 137; 2014 c 140 s 30; 2011 c 298 s 37; 1979 c 107 s 9; 1967 ex.s. c 26 s 14; 1961 c 15 s 82.02.010. Prior: 1935 c 180 s 3; RRS s 8370-3.]
Notes:
Intent—Finding—2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101.
Purpose—Intent—Agency transfer—Contracting—Effective date—2011 c 298: See notes following RCW 19.02.020.
Effective date—1967 ex.s. c 26: See note following RCW 82.01.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: Booker Auction Co. v. Dept. of Revenue, 241 P.3d 439 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010).
Booker Auction Co. v. Dept. of Revenue, 241 P.3d 439 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “" RCW 82.02.010(3). Based on this definition, Booker qualifies as a taxpayer.”
Booker Auction Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 158 Wash. App. 84 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “” RCW 82.02.010(3). Based on this definition, Booker qualifies as a taxpayer.”
Clark Cnty. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Dep't of Revenue, 222 P.3d 1232 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “¶47 Nor is it the case that because the Districts are “taxpayers” under RCW 82.02.010(3), they are entitled to recovery of overpaid privilege taxes under the general administrative provisions.”
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 493 P.2d 802 (Wash. Ct. App. 1972). “88 which Morrison was required to pay in order to pursue its remedy against the Department of Highways and appeal the tax assessment.”
CLARK Cnty. PUD v. Dept. of Revenue, 222 P.3d 1232 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “¶ 47 Nor is it the case that because the Districts are "taxpayers" under RCW 82.02.010(3), they are entitled to recovery of overpaid privilege taxes under the general administrative provisions.”
The Kroger Co., V. Keith Caneer (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “See RCW 82.02.010(5) (defining “taxpayer” as any individual “liable for any tax or the collection of any tax hereunder, or who engages in any business or performs any act for which a tax is imposed by this title”).”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.02.010(3) — 5 cases
Booker Auction Co. v. Dept. of Revenue, 241 P.3d 439 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “" RCW 82.02.010(3). Based on this definition, Booker qualifies as a taxpayer.”
Booker Auction Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 158 Wash. App. 84 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “” RCW 82.02.010(3). Based on this definition, Booker qualifies as a taxpayer.”
Clark Cnty. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 v. Dep't of Revenue, 222 P.3d 1232 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “¶47 Nor is it the case that because the Districts are “taxpayers” under RCW 82.02.010(3), they are entitled to recovery of overpaid privilege taxes under the general administrative provisions.”
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 493 P.2d 802 (Wash. Ct. App. 1972). “88 which Morrison was required to pay in order to pursue its remedy against the Department of Highways and appeal the tax assessment.”
CLARK Cnty. PUD v. Dept. of Revenue, 222 P.3d 1232 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “¶ 47 Nor is it the case that because the Districts are "taxpayers" under RCW 82.02.010(3), they are entitled to recovery of overpaid privilege taxes under the general administrative provisions.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.02.010(5) — 1 case
The Kroger Co., V. Keith Caneer (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “See RCW 82.02.010(5) (defining “taxpayer” as any individual “liable for any tax or the collection of any tax hereunder, or who engages in any business or performs any act for which a tax is imposed by this title”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.