Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.04.433 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes:
Intent—Finding—2009 c 494: "(1) Through this act the legislature intends to address the taxation of persons manufacturing and/or selling bunker fuel. Bunker fuel is fuel intended for consumption outside the waters of the United States by vessels in foreign commerce. Although the state has historically collected tax from bunker fuel manufacturers, recently questions have arisen whether the manufacture of bunker fuel is subject to business and occupation tax under RCW 82.04.240. Pursuant to this act, the activity is taxable under RCW 82.04.240.
(2) The legislature finds that at the time the deduction allowed under RCW 82.04.433 was enacted in 1985, it was intended to apply only to the wholesaling or retailing of bunker fuel. In 1987 the legislature enacted the multiple activities tax credit in RCW 82.04.440. Enactment of the multiple activities tax credit resulted in changed tax liability for certain taxpayers. In particular, some taxpayers that engaged in activities that had been exempt under the prior multiple activities exemption became subject to tax on manufacturing activities upon enactment of the multiple activities tax credit in its place. The manufacturing of bunker fuel is one such activity." [ 2009 c 494 s 1.]
Administration—2009 c 494: "The department of revenue must take any actions that are necessary to ensure that its rules and other interpretive statements are consistent with this act." [ 2009 c 494 s 3.]
Application—2009 c 494: "This act applies both prospectively and retroactively." [ 2009 c 494 s 4.]
Effective date—2009 c 494: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [May 14, 2009]." [ 2009 c 494 s 6.]
Severability—Effective date—1985 c 471: See notes following RCW 82.04.260.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2010–2012 · leading case: Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 159 Wash. App. 104 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010).
Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 159 Wash. App. 104 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Tesoro argues that the statute governing the relevant deduction, former RCW 82.04.433 (1985), unambiguously entitles a manufacturer that also sells certain products to take a deduction against its business and occupation (B&O) tax liability.”
Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 269 P.3d 1013 (Wash. 2012). “In 1986, DOR issued WAC 458-20-175, which required the seller of fuel to obtain a certificate of sale from the buyer in order to qualify for the RCW 82.04.433(1) tax exemption.”
Tesoro Refining v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 246 P.3d 211 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Tesoro argues that the statute governing the relevant deduction, former RCW 82.04.433 (1985), unambiguously entitles a manufacturer that also sells certain products to take a deduction against its business and occupation (B & O) tax liability.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.04.433(1) — 3 cases
Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 269 P.3d 1013 (Wash. 2012). “In 1986, DOR issued WAC 458-20-175, which required the seller of fuel to obtain a certificate of sale from the buyer in order to qualify for the RCW 82.04.433(1) tax exemption.”
Tesoro Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 159 Wash. App. 104 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Tesoro argues that the statute governing the relevant deduction, former RCW 82.04.433 (1985), unambiguously entitles a manufacturer that also sells certain products to take a deduction against its business and occupation (B&O) tax liability.”
Tesoro Refining v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 246 P.3d 211 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Tesoro argues that the statute governing the relevant deduction, former RCW 82.04.433 (1985), unambiguously entitles a manufacturer that also sells certain products to take a deduction against its business and occupation (B & O) tax liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.