Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.08.037 (2026)
Credits and refunds for bad debts
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) A seller is entitled to a credit or refund for sales taxes previously paid on bad debts, as that term is used in 26 U.S.C. Sec. 166, as amended or renumbered as of January 1, 2003.
(2) For purposes of this section, "bad debts" does not include:
(a) Amounts due on property that remains in the possession of the seller until the full purchase price is paid;
(b) Expenses incurred in attempting to collect debt;
(c) Debts sold or assigned by the seller to third parties, where the third party is without recourse against the seller; and
(d) Repossessed property.
(3) If a credit or refund of sales tax is taken for a bad debt and the debt is subsequently collected in whole or in part, the tax on the amount collected must be paid and reported on the return filed for the period in which the collection is made.
(4) Payments on a previously claimed bad debt are applied first proportionally to the taxable price of the property or service and the sales or use tax thereon, and secondly to interest, service charges, and any other charges.
(5) If the seller uses a certified service provider as defined in RCW 82.32.020 to administer its sales tax responsibilities, the certified service provider may claim, on behalf of the seller, the credit or refund allowed by this section. The certified service provider must credit or refund the full amount received to the seller.
(6) The department must allow an allocation of bad debts among member states to the streamlined sales tax agreement, as defined in RCW 82.58.010(1), if the books and records of the person claiming bad debts support the allocation.
(7) A person's right to claim a credit or refund under this section is not assignable. No person other than the original seller in the transaction that generated the bad debt or, as provided in subsection (5) of this section, a certified service provider, is entitled to claim a credit or refund under this section. If the original seller in the transaction that generated the bad debt has sold or assigned the debt instrument to a third party with recourse, the original seller may claim a credit or refund under this section only after the debt instrument is reassigned by the third party to the original seller.
[ 2010 1st sp.s. c 23 s 1502; 2007 c 6 s 102; 2004 c 153 s 302; 2003 c 168 s 212; 1982 1st ex.s. c 35 s 35.]
Notes:
Intent—2010 1st sp.s. c 23 ss 1502 and 1503: "The legislature intends with sections 1502 and 1503 of this act to supersede the holding of the supreme court of the state of Washington in Puget Sound National Bank v. Department of Revenue, 123 Wn.2d 284 (1994)." [ 2010 1st sp.s. c 23 s 1501.]
Application—2010 1st sp.s. c 23 ss 1502 and 1503: "Sections 1502 and 1503 of this act apply to claims for credit or refund filed with the department of revenue after June 30, 2010." [ 2010 1st sp.s. c 23 s 1719.]
Effective date—2010 1st sp.s. c 23: See note following RCW 82.32.655.
Findings—Intent—2010 1st sp.s. c 23: See notes following RCW 82.04.220.
Part headings not law—Savings—Effective date—Severability—2007 c 6: See notes following RCW 82.32.020.
Findings—Intent—2007 c 6: See note following RCW 82.14.390.
Bad debts—Intent—2004 c 153 ss 302-305: "For the purposes of sections 302 through 305 of this act, the legislature does not intend by any provision of this act relating to bad debts, and did not intend by any provision of chapter 168, Laws of 2003 relating to bad debts, to affect the holding of the supreme court of the state of Washington in Puget Sound National Bank v. the Department of Revenue, 123 Wn. 2nd 284 (1994)." [ 2004 c 153 s 301.]
Retroactive effective date—Effective date—2004 c 153: See note following RCW 82.08.0293.
Effective dates—Part headings not law—2003 c 168: See notes following RCW 82.08.010.
Severability—Effective dates—1982 1st ex.s. c 35: See notes following RCW 82.08.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: Puget Sound Nat'l Bank v. Dep't of Revenue, 868 P.2d 127 (Wash. 1994).
Puget Sound Nat'l Bank v. Dep't of Revenue, 868 P.2d 127 (Wash. 1994). “The Washington State Department of Revenue appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Thurston County Superior Court which granted Puget Sound National Bank a retail sales tax refund under RCW 82.08.037. We accepted direct review and hold that Puget Sound National Bank is…”
Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 455 P.3d 659 (Wash. 2020). “The former sales tax and B&O tax administrative rule reiterated that under RCW 82.08.037 and RCW 82.04.4284, sellers are entitled to a credit, refund, or deduction for sales or B&O taxes previously paid on "bad debts" under section 166 ofthe Internal Revenue Code, and the former…”
Home Depot USA v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 215 P.3d 222 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “¶ 1 Under former RCW 82.08.037 (2002), Home Depot USA, Inc.”
Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 151 Wash. App. 909 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “¶1 Under former RCW 82.08.037 (2002), Home Depot USA, Inc.”
Lowe's Home Centers, Llc v. Dept. Of Revenue, State Of Wa, 425 P.3d 959 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “” 3 Three versions of RCW 82.08.037 were in effect during the assessment period at issue here.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Bank of Am., 752 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). “The trial court held that the bank was a "seller" for purposes of RCW 82.08.037 and was entitled to a refund for the sales tax paid on the worthless debts.”
In Re Tax Appeal of Ford Motor Credit Co., 69 P.3d 612 (Kan. 2003). “” Wash. Rev. Code § 82.08.037 . The statutory definition of seller was a person making sales at retail, and the statutory definition of person included an assignee.”
Santander Consum. USA Inc v. State Treasurer, 918 N.W.2d 662 (Mich. 2018). “"); Wash. Rev. Code 82.08.037(2) ("For purposes of this section, 'bad debts' does not include: .”
Am. Disc. Corp. v. Shepherd, 156 P.3d 858 (Wash. 2007). “¶ 21 In Puget Sound National Bank itself, the court held that where automobile dealers assigned installment contracts to a bank, the bank stepped into the dealers' shoes and assumed their status with respect to all rights and liabilities related to the contracts, including the…”
Dep't of Taxation v. Daimler-Chrysler Servs. North Am., LLC, 119 P.3d 135 (Nev. 2005). “Wash. Rev. Code § 82.08.037 . Id. § 82.08.”
Am. Disc. Corp. v. Shepherd, 160 Wash. 2d 93 (Wash. 2007). “30, § 5) (at issue in Estate of Jordan)', former RCW 82.08.037 (1982) (at issue in Puget Sound Nat’l Bank).”
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of Taxes, 2016 VT 69 (Vt. 2016). “” Id. at n.1 . The Department of Revenue denied the refund petition.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.08.037(1) — 2 cases
Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 455 P.3d 659 (Wash. 2020). “The former sales tax and B&O tax administrative rule reiterated that under RCW 82.08.037 and RCW 82.04.4284, sellers are entitled to a credit, refund, or deduction for sales or B&O taxes previously paid on "bad debts" under section 166 ofthe Internal Revenue Code, and the former…”
Lowe's Home Centers, Llc v. Dept. Of Revenue, State Of Wa, 425 P.3d 959 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “” 3 Three versions of RCW 82.08.037 were in effect during the assessment period at issue here.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.08.037(2) — 2 cases
Santander Consum. USA Inc v. State Treasurer, 918 N.W.2d 662 (Mich. 2018). “"); Wash. Rev. Code 82.08.037(2) ("For purposes of this section, 'bad debts' does not include: .”
Home Depot USA v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 215 P.3d 222 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “¶ 1 Under former RCW 82.08.037 (2002), Home Depot USA, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.