Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 82.32.100 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) If any person fails or refuses to make any return or to make available for examination the records required by this chapter, the department shall proceed, in such manner as it may deem best, to obtain facts and information on which to base its estimate of the tax; and to this end the department may examine the records of any such person as provided in RCW 82.32.110.
(2) As soon as the department procures such facts and information as it is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax payable by any person who has failed or refused to make a return, it shall proceed to determine and assess against such person the tax and any applicable penalties or interest due, but such action shall not deprive such person from appealing the assessment as provided in this chapter. The department shall notify the taxpayer by mail, or electronically as provided in RCW 82.32.135, of the total amount of such tax, penalties, and interest, and the total amount shall become due and shall be paid within thirty days from the date of such notice.
(3) No assessment or correction of an assessment may be made by the department more than four years after the close of the tax year, except (a) against a taxpayer who has not registered as required by this chapter, (b) upon a showing of fraud or of misrepresentation of a material fact by the taxpayer, or (c) where a taxpayer has executed a written waiver of such limitation. The execution of a written waiver shall also extend the period for making a refund or credit as provided in RCW 82.32.060(2).
[ 2007 c 111 s 107; 1992 c 169 s 3; 1989 c 378 s 21; 1971 ex.s. c 299 s 20; 1965 ex.s. c 141 s 4; 1961 c 15 s 82.32.100. Prior: 1951 1st ex.s. c 9 s 10; 1935 c 180 s 194; RRS s 8370-194.]

Notes:

Part headings not law2007 c 111: See note following RCW 82.16.120.
Effective dateApplicability1992 c 169: See note following RCW 82.32.050.
Effective datesSeverability1971 ex.s. c 299: See notes following RCW 82.04.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: AOL, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 149 Wash. App. 533 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009).
AOL, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 149 Wash. App. 533 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “100(2) covers Department assessments where the taxpayer has failed to keep adequate records; in this statute, the legislature uses the term “assessment” interchangeably with the phrase “such tax, penalties and interest”: [The Department] shall proceed to determine and assess…”
Shutt v. Moore, 613 P.2d 1188 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980). “65 tax assessed against him pursuant to RCW 82.32.100. When the State Department of Revenue, through its employees and officials, undertook statutory enforcement procedures to collect the tax, the *452 plaintiff brought a damage action against them under 42 U.”
Aol, LLC v. Washington State Dept., 205 P.3d 159 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “100(2) covers Department assessments where the taxpayer has failed to keep adequate records; in this statute, the legislature uses the term "assessment" interchangeably with the phrase "such tax, penalties and interest": [The Department] shall proceed to determine and assess…”
Lakeside Indus., Inc., V. Dep't Of Revenue (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “In Wells Fargo, the court determined the APA governed a dispute over a settlement agreement between DOR and a taxpayer because the provision authorizing DOR to execute settlement agreements does not provide for de novo review.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.32.100(2) — 3 cases
AOL, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 149 Wash. App. 533 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “100(2) covers Department assessments where the taxpayer has failed to keep adequate records; in this statute, the legislature uses the term “assessment” interchangeably with the phrase “such tax, penalties and interest”: [The Department] shall proceed to determine and assess…”
Aol, LLC v. Washington State Dept., 205 P.3d 159 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “100(2) covers Department assessments where the taxpayer has failed to keep adequate records; in this statute, the legislature uses the term "assessment" interchangeably with the phrase "such tax, penalties and interest": [The Department] shall proceed to determine and assess…”
Lakeside Indus., Inc., V. Dep't Of Revenue (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “In Wells Fargo, the court determined the APA governed a dispute over a settlement agreement between DOR and a taxpayer because the provision authorizing DOR to execute settlement agreements does not provide for de novo review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.