Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 84.41.010 (2026)
Declaration of policy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Recent comprehensive studies by the legislative council have disclosed gross inequality and nonuniformity in valuation of real property for tax purposes throughout the state. Serious nonuniformity in valuations exists both between similar property within the various taxing districts and between general levels of valuation of the various counties. Such nonuniformity results in inequality in taxation contrary to standards of fairness and uniformity required and established by the Constitution and is of such flagrant and widespread occurrence as to constitute a grave emergency adversely affecting state and local government and the welfare of all the people.
Traditional public policy of the state has vested large measure of control in matters of property valuation in county government, and the state hereby declares its purpose to continue such policy. However, present statutes and practices thereunder have failed to achieve the measure of uniformity required by the Constitution; the resultant widespread inequality and nonuniformity in valuation of property can and should no longer be tolerated. It thus becomes necessary to require general revaluation of property throughout the state.
[ 1961 c 15 s 84.41.010. Prior: 1955 c 251 s 1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1971–2005 · leading case: Advanced Silicon Materials, L.L.C. v. Grant Cnty., 124 P.3d 294 (Wash. 2005).
Advanced Silicon Materials, L.L.C. v. Grant Cnty., 124 P.3d 294 (Wash. 2005). “” RCW 84.41.010. 3 Pursuant to RCW 84.41.030, [e]ach county assessor shall maintain an active and systematic program of revaluation on a continuous basis, and shall establish a revaluation schedule which will result in revaluation of all taxable real property within the county…”
Advanced Silicon Materials v. Grant Cnty., 124 P.3d 294 (Wash. 2005). “" RCW 84.41.010. [3] Pursuant to RCW 84.41.”
Dore v. Kinnear, 489 P.2d 898 (Wash. 1971). “This purpose is clearly defined in RCW 84.41.010 which declares in part: Traditional public policy of the state has vested large measure of control in matters of property valuation in county government, and the state hereby declares its purpose to continue such policy.”
Island Cnty. Comm. on Assessment Ratios v. Dep't of Revenue, 500 P.2d 756 (Wash. 1972). “To recognize the relationship between the requirement of uniformity in real property taxation and the constitutional requirement that the legislature provide a uniform system of schools establishes, in our view, an amply reasonable relationship between a program which…”
Schreiber v. Riemcke, 526 P.2d 904 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974). “” RCW 84.41.010. The plaintiff argues that a revaluation by the assessor, “out of cycle,” was precluded because of the defendants’ failure to appeal to the tax commission the Equalization Board’s determination of value in 1971.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.