Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.04.010 (2026)

False advertising

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person, firm, corporation or association who, with intent to sell or in any wise dispose of merchandise, securities, service, or anything offered by such person, firm, corporation or association, directly or indirectly, to the public for sale or distribution, or with intent to increase the consumption thereof, or to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto, or to acquire title thereto, or an interest therein, makes, publishes, disseminates, circulates, or places before the public, or causes, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed before the public in this state, in a newspaper or other publication, or in the form of a book, notice, hand-bill, poster, bill, circular, pamphlet, or letter, or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding merchandise, securities, service, or anything so offered to the public, which advertisement contains any assertion, representation or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive or misleading, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor: PROVIDED, That the provisions of this section shall not apply to any owner, publisher, agent, or employee of a newspaper for the publication of such advertisement published in good faith and without knowledge of the falsity thereof.
[ 1913 c 34 s 1; RRS s 2622-1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: Sauk-suiattle Indian Tribe, V. City Of Seattle, 525 P.3d 238 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
Sauk-suiattle Indian Tribe, V. City Of Seattle, 525 P.3d 238 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “The Tribe argues that the City’s conduct violates RCW 9.04.010, which makes false advertising a crime: -6- For the current opinion, go to https://www.”
Adams v. Whited, 642 P.2d 412 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982). “31 (The Employment Agency Act); RCW Title 48 (insurance act); RCW 46.70 (unfair motor vehicle business practices act); RCW 63.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.