Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.46

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.46.095

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No court of the state of Washington other than the superior court of Thurston county shall have jurisdiction over any action or proceeding against the commission or any member thereof for anything done or omitted to be done in or arising out of the performance of his or her duties under this title: PROVIDED, That an appeal from an adjudicative proceeding involving a final decision of the commission to deny, suspend, or revoke a license shall be governed by chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure Act.
Neither the commission nor any member or members thereof shall be personally liable in any action at law for damages sustained by any person because of any acts performed or done, or omitted to be done, by the commission or any member of the commission, or any employee of the commission, in the performance of his or her duties and in the administration of this title.
[ 1989 c 175 s 41; 1981 c 139 s 17.]

Notes:

Effective date—1989 c 175: See note following RCW 34.05.010.
Severability—1981 c 139: See note following RCW 9.46.070.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2009–2020 · leading case: ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling Commission
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling Commission (2012) wash · cites it 15× “Ten days later, the State informed ZDI Gaming that, in its view, RCW 9.46.095 *615 granted exclusive jurisdiction of the matter to the Thurston County Superior Court and suggested that it may wish to withdraw its petition from Pierce County and file in Thurston County before the…”
ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling Commission (2009) washctapp · cites it 11× “On September 21, 2006, the Commission notified ZDI that RCW 9.46.095 granted Thurston County Superior Court exclusive jurisdiction over the matter and suggested that ZDI dismiss its Pierce County action and refile in Thurston County.”
Zdi v. State Ex Rel. State Gambling Com'n (2009) washctapp · cites it 11× “On September 21, 2006, the Commission notified ZDI that RCW 9.46.095 granted Thurston County Superior Court exclusive jurisdiction over the matter and suggested that ZDI dismiss its Pierce County action and refile in Thurston County.”
Kellar v. Estate of Kellar (2012) washctapp “RCW 9.46.095; RCW 34.05.570. The Estate has not, however, cited any Washington authority which has previously applied judicial estoppel to a position taken in an earlier quasi-judicial proceeding.”
Ralph v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (2016) wash “3d 929 (2012) (holding that “[t]he legislature wanted to have cases involving the Gambling Commission heard in Thurston County” pursuant to a statutory provision that “ ‘[n]o court of the state of Washington other than the superior court of Thurston county shall have…”
Jay Gerow, V Wa State Gambling Comm (2017) washctapp · cites it 19× “individual defendants had legislative immunity from claims regarding 2008 amendments to gambling regulations, (b) res judicata based on the prior federal lawsuit barred all claims relating to the State defendants’ actions before Gerow filed the federal lawsuit, and (c) Gerow did…”
State Of Washington v. James H. Manuel (2020) washctapp “The State contended that RCW 9.46.095, which provided that “[n]o court of the state of Washington other than the superior court of Thurston county shall have jurisdiction over any action or proceeding against the commission,” granted exclusive jurisdiction to only that superior…”
Ralph v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (2016) wash “3d 929 (2012) (holding that "[t]he legislature wanted to have cases involving the Gambling Commission heard in Thurston County" pursuant to a statutory provision that'" [n]o court of the state of Washington other than the superior court of Thurston county shall have jurisdiction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.