Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.92
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.92.064 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In the case of a person granted a suspended sentence under the provisions of RCW 9.92.060, the court shall establish a definite termination date for the suspended sentence. The court shall set a date no later than the time the original sentence would have elapsed and may provide for an earlier termination of the suspended sentence. Prior to the entry of an order formally terminating a suspended sentence the court may modify the terms and conditions of the suspension or extend the period of the suspended sentence.
[ 1982 1st ex.s. c 47 s 9; 1971 ex.s. c 188 s 2.]

Notes:

Applicability—1984 c 209: See RCW 9.92.900.
Severability—1982 1st ex.s. c 47: See note following RCW 9.41.190.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: Couch v. Dep't of Corr., 54 P.3d 197 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Couch v. Dep't of Corr., 54 P.3d 197 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “230; RCW 9.92.064. DOC argues that Davis’ misdemeanor probation terminated by operation of law on December 21,1994.”
Couch v. Wa. Dep't of Corr., 54 P.3d 197 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “2d 1015 (1988) (under SRA, court cannot condition community placement on repeat offender not "violat[ing] any local, state or federal criminal statute, law or ordinance"); DAVID BOERNER, SENTENCING IN WASHINGTON at § 4, 4-5 to 4-6 (1985) (CCO's power "is restricted by the nature…”
State v. Rodriguez, 335 P.3d 448 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The court shall set a date no later than the time the original sentence would have elapsed and may provide for an earlier termination of the suspended sentence.”
State v. Monday, 540 P.2d 416 (Wash. 1975). · cites it 2× “This is made clear by RCW 9.92.064 which provides: In the case of a person granted a suspended sentence under the provisions of RCW 9.”
State v. Mortrud, 575 P.2d 227 (Wash. 1978). “In 1971, the suspended sentence statutes were amended by addition of RCW 9.92.064 which now limits the length of suspension to that of the original sentence.”
State v. Monday, 531 P.2d 811 (Wash. Ct. App. 1975). “) RCW 9.92.064 provides: “In the case of a person granted a suspended sentence under the provisions of RCW 9.”
State v. Robinson, 175 P.3d 1136 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “" RCW 9.92.064; see former RCW 9.95.210 (1983).”
State v. Robinson, 142 Wash. App. 649 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “” RCW 9.92.064; see former RCW 9.95.210 (1983).”
State Of Washington v. Clinton Laverne King (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “” Moreover, “[t]he court shall set a date no later than the time the original sentence would have elapsed and may provide for an earlier termination of the suspended sentence.”
State Of Washington v. Valentin Delgado (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “060(1), RCW 9.92.064, and RCW 9.95.210(1)(a). Delgado contends that these statutes provide the sentencing court with the authority to suspend a sentence, requires the sentencing court to set a date for termination of the suspended sentence, and limits the maximum term of a…”
State Of Washington v. Jerome Ward Moody (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “RCW 9.92.064. The State does not contend that there are any further legal obligations as a result of Moody’s misdemeanor convictions that are not also required by his felony conviction, and Moody does not identify any.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Gano, 596 P.2d 300 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “RCW 9.92.064. See also State v. Jackson, 87 Wn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.