Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The department shall supervise the following individuals who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.92.060, 9.95.204, or 9.95.210:
(a) Individuals convicted of:
(i) Sexual misconduct with a minor second degree;
(ii) Custodial sexual misconduct second degree;
(iii) Communication with a minor for immoral purposes; and
(iv) Violation of RCW 9A.44.132(2) (failure to register); and
(b) Individuals who have:
(i) A current conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense after August 1, 2011; and
(ii) A prior conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense or domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011.
(2) Individuals convicted of misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses supervised by the department pursuant to this section shall be placed on community custody.
(3) The department shall supervise every individual convicted of a felony and sentenced to community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701 or 9.94A.702 whose risk assessment classifies the individual as one who is at a high risk to reoffend.
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the department shall supervise an individual sentenced to community custody regardless of risk classification if the individual:
(a) Has a current conviction for a sex offense or a serious violent offense and was sentenced to a term of community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701, 9.94A.702, or 9.94A.507;
(b) Has been identified by the department as a dangerous mentally ill offender pursuant to RCW 72.09.370;
(c) Has an indeterminate sentence and is subject to parole pursuant to RCW 9.95.017;
(d) Has a current conviction for violating RCW 9A.44.132(1) (failure to register) and was sentenced to a term of community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701;
(e)(i) Has a current conviction for a domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011, and a prior conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense or domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011. This subsection (4)(e)(i) applies only to offenses committed prior to July 24, 2015;
(ii) Has a current conviction for a domestic violence felony offense. The state and its officers, agents, and employees shall not be held criminally or civilly liable for its supervision of an individual under this subsection (4)(e)(ii) unless the state and its officers, agents, and employees acted with gross negligence;
(g) Is subject to supervision pursuant to RCW 9.94A.745; or
(h) Was convicted and sentenced under RCW 46.61.520 (vehicular homicide), RCW 46.61.522 (vehicular assault), RCW 46.61.502(6) (felony DUI), or RCW 46.61.504(6) (felony physical control).
(5) The department shall supervise any individual released by the indeterminate sentence review board who was sentenced to community custody or subject to community custody under the terms of release.
(6) The department shall supervise any individual granted conditional commutation pursuant to RCW 9.94A.885 if the governor includes a term of community custody as a condition of commutation.
(7) The department is not authorized to, and may not, supervise any individual sentenced to a term of community custody or any probationer unless the individual or probationer is one for whom supervision is required under this section.
(8) The department shall conduct a risk assessment for every individual convicted of a felony and sentenced to a term of community custody who may be subject to supervision under this section.
(9) The period of time the department is authorized to supervise an individual under this section may not exceed the duration of community custody specified under RCW 9.94B.050, 9.94A.701 (1) through (9), or 9.94A.702, except in cases where the court has imposed an exceptional term of community custody under RCW 9.94A.535 and where the governor imposes a term of community custody as a condition of conditional commutation or imposes an additional term of community custody due to a violation of conditional commutation.
(10) The period of time the department is authorized to supervise an individual under this section may be reduced by the earned award of supervision compliance credit pursuant to RCW 9.94A.717.
[ 2025 c 371 s 1; 2024 c 63 s 3; 2021 c 242 s 2; 2020 c 275 s 1; 2019 c 191 s 2; 2016 sp.s. c 28 s 1. Prior: 2015 c 290 s 1; 2015 c 134 s 1; 2013 2nd sp.s. c 35 s 15; 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 2; prior: 2010 c 267 s 10; 2010 c 224 s 3; 2009 c 376 s 2; (2009 c 376 s 1 expired August 1, 2009); 2009 c 375 s 2; (2009 c 375 s 1 expired August 1, 2009); 2008 c 231 s 24; 2005 c 362 s 1; 2003 c 379 s 3.]
Notes:
Expiration date—2025 c 371 ss 1 and 4: "Sections 1 and 4 of this act expire January 1, 2026." [ 2025 c 371 s 10.]
Intent—2024 c 63: "The legislature recognizes the ongoing and increasing epidemic of domestic violence. Even when a perpetrator is held accountable by our criminal justice system, including by total confinement in a state correctional facility, many victims of domestic violence face the ongoing challenge of realizing physical and psychological safety in their daily lives. One mechanism by which the state supports survivors is through community supervision of defendants convicted of certain domestic violence offenses upon their release back into our communities.
The legislature acknowledges that the department of corrections serves a critical function by operating as the state agency entrusted with supervision of certain defendants. It is imperative that in every instance when a Washington court orders supervision for a defendant convicted of a qualifying domestic violence offense, the department of corrections undertakes its supervisory role. Accordingly, the legislature recognizes that certain changes must be made to the Washington sentencing reform act to ensure that the department of corrections' supervisory obligations are clear." [ 2024 c 63 s 1.]
Applicability—2021 c 242: See note following RCW 9.94A.695.
Implementation—2020 c 275: "The department of corrections has discretion to implement RCW 9.94A.501 and 9.94A.717 over a period of time not to exceed twelve months. For any offender under active supervision by the department as of June 11, 2020, he or she is not eligible to earn supervision compliance credit pursuant to RCW 9.94A.717 until he or she has received an orientation by the department regarding supervision compliance credit." [ 2020 c 275 s 3.]
Effective date—2015 c 134: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [April 29, 2015]." [ 2015 c 134 s 9.]
Application—Recalculation of community custody terms—2011 1st sp.s. c 40: "(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of this act apply to persons convicted before, on, or after June 15, 2011.
(2) By January 1, 2012, consistent with RCW 9.94A.171, 9.94A.501, and section 3 of this act, the department of corrections shall recalculate the term of community custody for offenders currently in confinement or serving a term of community custody. The department of corrections shall reset the date that community custody will end for those offenders. The recalculation shall not extend a term of community custody beyond that to which an offender is currently subject.
(3) By January 1, 2012, consistent with the provisions of RCW 9.94A.650, the department of corrections shall recalculate the term of community custody for each offender sentenced to a first-time offender waiver under RCW 9.94A.650 and currently in confinement or serving a term of community custody. The department of corrections shall reset the date that community custody will end for those offenders. The recalculation shall not extend a term of community custody beyond that to which an offender is currently subject." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 42.]
Effective date—2011 1st sp.s. c 40 ss 1-9 and 42: "Sections 1 through 9 and 42 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect immediately [June 15, 2011]." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 44.]
Application—2010 c 267: See note following RCW 9A.44.128.
Expiration date—2009 c 376 s 1: "Section 1 of this act expires August 1, 2009." [ 2009 c 376 s 4.]
Expiration date—2009 c 375 ss 1, 3, and 13: "Sections 1, 3, and 13 of this act expire August 1, 2009." [ 2009 c 375 s 19.]
Application—2009 c 375: "This act applies retroactively and prospectively regardless of whether the offender is currently on community custody or probation with the department, currently incarcerated with a term of community custody or probation with the department, or sentenced after July 26, 2009." [ 2009 c 375 s 20.]
Intent—Application—Application of repealers—Effective date—2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.
Severability—2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Effective date—2005 c 362: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [May 10, 2005]." [ 2005 c 362 s 5.]
Severability—Effective dates—2003 c 379: See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Conditions of probation: RCW 9.95.210.
Misdemeanant probation services—County supervision: RCW 9.95.204.
Suspending sentences: RCW 9.92.060.
(1) The department shall supervise the following individuals who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.92.060, 9.95.204, or 9.95.210:
(a) Individuals convicted of:
(i) Sexual misconduct with a minor second degree;
(ii) Custodial sexual misconduct second degree;
(iii) Communication with a minor for immoral purposes; and
(iv) Violation of RCW 9A.44.132(2) (failure to register); and
(b) Individuals who have:
(i) A current conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense after August 1, 2011; and
(ii) A prior conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense or domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011.
(2) Individuals convicted of misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses supervised by the department pursuant to this section shall be placed on community custody.
(3) The department shall supervise every individual convicted of a felony and sentenced to community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701 or 9.94A.702 whose risk assessment classifies the individual as one who is at a high risk to reoffend.
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the department shall supervise an individual sentenced to community custody regardless of risk classification if the individual:
(a) Has a current conviction for a sex offense or a serious violent offense and was sentenced to a term of community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701, 9.94A.702, or 9.94A.507;
(b) Has been identified by the department as a dangerous mentally ill offender pursuant to RCW 72.09.370;
(c) Has an indeterminate sentence and is subject to parole pursuant to RCW 9.95.017;
(d) Has a current conviction for violating RCW 9A.44.132(1) (failure to register) and was sentenced to a term of community custody pursuant to RCW 9.94A.701;
(e)(i) Has a current conviction for a domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011, and a prior conviction for a repetitive domestic violence offense or domestic violence felony offense after August 1, 2011. This subsection (4)(e)(i) applies only to offenses committed prior to July 24, 2015;
(ii) Has a current conviction for a domestic violence felony offense. The state and its officers, agents, and employees shall not be held criminally or civilly liable for its supervision of an individual under this subsection (4)(e)(ii) unless the state and its officers, agents, and employees acted with gross negligence;
(f) Was sentenced under RCW 9.94A.650, 9.94A.655, 9.94A.660, 9.94A.670, 9.94A.711, 9.94A.695, or 9.94A.661;
(g) Is subject to supervision pursuant to RCW 9.94A.745; or
(h) Was convicted and sentenced under RCW 46.61.520 (vehicular homicide), RCW 46.61.522 (vehicular assault), RCW 46.61.502(6) (felony DUI), or RCW 46.61.504(6) (felony physical control).
(5) The department shall supervise any individual released by the indeterminate sentence review board who was sentenced to community custody or subject to community custody under the terms of release.
(6) The department shall supervise any individual granted conditional commutation pursuant to RCW 9.94A.885.
(7) The department is not authorized to, and may not, supervise any individual sentenced to a term of community custody or any probationer unless the individual or probationer is one for whom supervision is required under this section.
(8) The department shall conduct a risk assessment for every individual convicted of a felony and sentenced to a term of community custody who may be subject to supervision under this section.
(9) The period of time the department is authorized to supervise an individual under this section may not exceed the duration of community custody specified under RCW 9.94B.050, 9.94A.701 (1) through (9), or 9.94A.702, except in cases where the court has imposed an exceptional term of community custody under RCW 9.94A.535 and where the governor imposes a term of community custody as a condition of conditional commutation or imposes an additional term of community custody due to a violation of conditional commutation.
(10) The period of time the department is authorized to supervise an individual under this section may be reduced by the earned award of supervision compliance credit pursuant to RCW 9.94A.717.
[ 2025 c 371 s 2. Prior: 2024 c 306 s 4; 2024 c 63 s 3; 2021 c 242 s 2; 2020 c 275 s 1; 2019 c 191 s 2; 2016 sp.s. c 28 s 1; prior: 2015 c 290 s 1; 2015 c 134 s 1; 2013 2nd sp.s. c 35 s 15; 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 2; prior: 2010 c 267 s 10; 2010 c 224 s 3; 2009 c 376 s 2; (2009 c 376 s 1 expired August 1, 2009); 2009 c 375 s 2; (2009 c 375 s 1 expired August 1, 2009); 2008 c 231 s 24; 2005 c 362 s 1; 2003 c 379 s 3.]
Notes:
Effective date—2025 c 371 ss 2 and 5: "Sections 2 and 5 of this act take effect January 1, 2026." [ 2025 c 371 s 11.]
Effective date—2024 c 306: See note following RCW 9.94A.661.
Intent—2024 c 63: "The legislature recognizes the ongoing and increasing epidemic of domestic violence. Even when a perpetrator is held accountable by our criminal justice system, including by total confinement in a state correctional facility, many victims of domestic violence face the ongoing challenge of realizing physical and psychological safety in their daily lives. One mechanism by which the state supports survivors is through community supervision of defendants convicted of certain domestic violence offenses upon their release back into our communities.
The legislature acknowledges that the department of corrections serves a critical function by operating as the state agency entrusted with supervision of certain defendants. It is imperative that in every instance when a Washington court orders supervision for a defendant convicted of a qualifying domestic violence offense, the department of corrections undertakes its supervisory role. Accordingly, the legislature recognizes that certain changes must be made to the Washington sentencing reform act to ensure that the department of corrections' supervisory obligations are clear." [ 2024 c 63 s 1.]
Applicability—2021 c 242: See note following RCW 9.94A.695.
Implementation—2020 c 275: "The department of corrections has discretion to implement RCW 9.94A.501 and 9.94A.717 over a period of time not to exceed twelve months. For any offender under active supervision by the department as of June 11, 2020, he or she is not eligible to earn supervision compliance credit pursuant to RCW 9.94A.717 until he or she has received an orientation by the department regarding supervision compliance credit." [ 2020 c 275 s 3.]
Effective date—2015 c 134: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [April 29, 2015]." [ 2015 c 134 s 9.]
Application—Recalculation of community custody terms—2011 1st sp.s. c 40: "(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of this act apply to persons convicted before, on, or after June 15, 2011.
(2) By January 1, 2012, consistent with RCW 9.94A.171, 9.94A.501, and section 3 of this act, the department of corrections shall recalculate the term of community custody for offenders currently in confinement or serving a term of community custody. The department of corrections shall reset the date that community custody will end for those offenders. The recalculation shall not extend a term of community custody beyond that to which an offender is currently subject.
(3) By January 1, 2012, consistent with the provisions of RCW 9.94A.650, the department of corrections shall recalculate the term of community custody for each offender sentenced to a first-time offender waiver under RCW 9.94A.650 and currently in confinement or serving a term of community custody. The department of corrections shall reset the date that community custody will end for those offenders. The recalculation shall not extend a term of community custody beyond that to which an offender is currently subject." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 42.]
Effective date—2011 1st sp.s. c 40 ss 1-9 and 42: "Sections 1 through 9 and 42 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect immediately [June 15, 2011]." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 40 s 44.]
Application—2010 c 267: See note following RCW 9A.44.128.
Expiration date—2009 c 376 s 1: "Section 1 of this act expires August 1, 2009." [ 2009 c 376 s 4.]
Expiration date—2009 c 375 ss 1, 3, and 13: "Sections 1, 3, and 13 of this act expire August 1, 2009." [ 2009 c 375 s 19.]
Application—2009 c 375: "This act applies retroactively and prospectively regardless of whether the offender is currently on community custody or probation with the department, currently incarcerated with a term of community custody or probation with the department, or sentenced after July 26, 2009." [ 2009 c 375 s 20.]
Intent—Application—Application of repealers—Effective date—2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.
Severability—2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Effective date—2005 c 362: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [May 10, 2005]." [ 2005 c 362 s 5.]
Severability—Effective dates—2003 c 379: See notes following RCW 9.94A.728.
Conditions of probation: RCW 9.95.210.
Misdemeanant probation services—County supervision: RCW 9.95.204.
Suspending sentences: RCW 9.92.060.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: State Of Washington, V. Matthew Benjamin Labounty, 487 P.3d 221 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
State Of Washington, V. Matthew Benjamin Labounty, 487 P.3d 221 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “729(5)(a) states, “A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the [DOC] pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 . . . shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
State v. Bruch, 346 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2015). “The statute reads, in pertinent part: A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 or 9.94A.5011, shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
In re the Postsentence Review of Childers, 143 P.3d 831 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 9.94A.501 simply requires DOC to supervise those who were properly sentenced to community custody prior to the 2003 amendments.”
State v. Franklin, 263 P.3d 585 (Wash. 2011). “729(5)(a) provides: A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 [allowing DOC to supervise certain offenders sentenced to community custody under RCW 9.”
John Doe G v. Dep't of Corr., 391 P.3d 496 (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “15 RCW 9.94A.501(4)(f). 16 The recidivism rate for sex offenders sentenced to prison terms was 16.”
Husted v. State, 187 Wash. App. 579 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “501, all offenders sentenced to terms involving community supervision, community restitution, community placement, or community custody shall be under the supervision of the department and shall follow explicitly the instructions and conditions of the department.”
M. Gwyn Myles v. Dep't Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “1 Because the DOC lacked the authority (1) to supervise Villanueva-Villa on his felony conviction under former RCW 9.94A.501 (2003), (2) to toll Villanueva-Villa’s misdemeanor probation, and (3) to supervise him on his misdemeanor conviction after May 10, 2005 under former RCW 9.”
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
State Of Washington, V. Jeremy Michael Santiago (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “81809-1-I/5 attempts to circumvent the legislature’s requirements in RCW 9.94A.501 by arguing that it is Santiago’s burden to establish that these domestic violence allegations were pleaded prior to August 1, 2011.”
Pers. Restraint Petition Of Jeffry Dale Davis (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “729 applies to convicted people “supervised by [DOC] pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501.” RCW 9.94A.501(4)(a) then provides that “[DOC] shall supervise an offender .”
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Robert Rachels, App. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Relevant to the crimes at issue here, RCW 9.94A.501 provides: [DOC] shall supervise the following offenders who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(1) — 3 cases
State Of Washington, V Charles Tewee (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
M. Gwyn Myles v. Dep't Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “1 Because the DOC lacked the authority (1) to supervise Villanueva-Villa on his felony conviction under former RCW 9.94A.501 (2003), (2) to toll Villanueva-Villa’s misdemeanor probation, and (3) to supervise him on his misdemeanor conviction after May 10, 2005 under former RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, V. Jeremy Michael Santiago (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “81809-1-I/5 attempts to circumvent the legislature’s requirements in RCW 9.94A.501 by arguing that it is Santiago’s burden to establish that these domestic violence allegations were pleaded prior to August 1, 2011.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(1)(a)(iii) — 1 case
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Robert Rachels, App. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Relevant to the crimes at issue here, RCW 9.94A.501 provides: [DOC] shall supervise the following offenders who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(1)(b) — 1 case
State Of Washington, V. Jeremy Michael Santiago (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “81809-1-I/5 attempts to circumvent the legislature’s requirements in RCW 9.94A.501 by arguing that it is Santiago’s burden to establish that these domestic violence allegations were pleaded prior to August 1, 2011.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(2) — 3 cases
In re the Postsentence Review of Childers, 143 P.3d 831 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 9.94A.501 simply requires DOC to supervise those who were properly sentenced to community custody prior to the 2003 amendments.”
M. Gwyn Myles v. Dep't Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “1 Because the DOC lacked the authority (1) to supervise Villanueva-Villa on his felony conviction under former RCW 9.94A.501 (2003), (2) to toll Villanueva-Villa’s misdemeanor probation, and (3) to supervise him on his misdemeanor conviction after May 10, 2005 under former RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Robert Rachels, App. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Relevant to the crimes at issue here, RCW 9.94A.501 provides: [DOC] shall supervise the following offenders who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(3) — 2 cases
State Of Washington, V. Matthew Benjamin Labounty, 487 P.3d 221 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “729(5)(a) states, “A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the [DOC] pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 . . . shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
M. Gwyn Myles v. Dep't Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “1 Because the DOC lacked the authority (1) to supervise Villanueva-Villa on his felony conviction under former RCW 9.94A.501 (2003), (2) to toll Villanueva-Villa’s misdemeanor probation, and (3) to supervise him on his misdemeanor conviction after May 10, 2005 under former RCW 9.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(4) — 7 cases
State Of Washington, V. Matthew Benjamin Labounty, 487 P.3d 221 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “729(5)(a) states, “A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the [DOC] pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 . . . shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
State v. Bruch, 346 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2015). “The statute reads, in pertinent part: A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 or 9.94A.5011, shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
Pers. Restraint Petition Of: Marlow Todd Eggum (Wash. Ct. App. 2020).
Pers. Restraint Petition Of: Marlow Todd Eggum (Wash. Ct. App. 2020).
State Of Washington, Res./cross App v. Matthew C. Bruch, App./cross Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2014).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(4)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Bruch, 346 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2015). “The statute reads, in pertinent part: A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 or 9.94A.5011, shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
State Of Washington, V. Matthew Benjamin Labounty, 487 P.3d 221 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “729(5)(a) states, “A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the [DOC] pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 . . . shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
State Of Washington v. Michael Lee Wolfenberger (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(4)(f) — 1 case
John Doe G v. Dep't of Corr., 391 P.3d 496 (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “15 RCW 9.94A.501(4)(f). 16 The recidivism rate for sex offenders sentenced to prison terms was 16.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(5) — 4 cases
State v. Bruch, 346 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2015). “The statute reads, in pertinent part: A person who is eligible for earned early release as provided in this section and who will be supervised by the department pursuant to RCW 9.94A.501 or 9.94A.5011, shall be transferred to community custody in lieu of earned release time.”
Wa State Dep't Of Corr., V. Anthony & Julie Smith (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
State v. Bruch (Wash. 2015). “The referenced statute RCW 9.94A.501 governs the DOC's authority to supervise community custody imposed by a trial court.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(6) — 1 case
State Of Washington, V. Jeremy Michael Santiago (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “81809-1-I/5 attempts to circumvent the legislature’s requirements in RCW 9.94A.501 by arguing that it is Santiago’s burden to establish that these domestic violence allegations were pleaded prior to August 1, 2011.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(7) — 1 case
James D. Mock v. State Of Washington, Dep't Of Corr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.501(a)(iii) — 1 case
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Robert Rachels, App. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “Relevant to the crimes at issue here, RCW 9.94A.501 provides: [DOC] shall supervise the following offenders who are sentenced to probation in superior court, pursuant to RCW 9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.