Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 100.25 (2026)
Cumulative remedies
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: Koble Investments v. Elicia Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (Wis. 2026).
Koble Investments v. Elicia Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (Wis. 2026). “§§ 100.25(1) or 425.308(1) because he withdrew from representing Marquardt.”
Nathan Bikowski v. Pro Seamless of Wisconsin Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 100.25(5). In so doing, the court may have misinterpreted the language of the pertinent statutes and administrative regulations, which do not necessarily require 19 No.”
— Wis. Stat. § 100.25(1) — 1 case
Koble Investments v. Elicia Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (Wis. 2026). “§§ 100.25(1) or 425.308(1) because he withdrew from representing Marquardt.”
— Wis. Stat. § 100.25(5) — 1 case
Nathan Bikowski v. Pro Seamless of Wisconsin Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 100.25(5). In so doing, the court may have misinterpreted the language of the pertinent statutes and administrative regulations, which do not necessarily require 19 No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.