Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 102.24 (2026)
Remanding record
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
102.24(1)(1) Upon the setting aside of any order or award, the court may recommit the controversy and remand the record in the case to the commission for further hearing or proceedings, or it may enter the proper judgment upon the findings of the commission, as the nature of the case shall demand. An abstract of the judgment entered by the trial court upon the review of any order or award shall be made by the clerk of circuit court upon the judgment and lien docket entry of any judgment which may have been rendered upon the order or award. Transcripts of the abstract may be obtained for like entry upon the judgment and lien dockets of the courts of other counties.
102.24(2)(2) After the commencement of an action to review any order or award of the commission, the parties may have the record remanded by the court for such time and under such condition as the parties may provide, for the purpose of having the department act upon the question of approving or disapproving any settlement or compromise that the parties may desire to have so approved. If approved, the action shall be at an end and judgment may be entered upon the approval as upon an award. If not approved, the department shall immediately return the record to the circuit court and the action shall proceed as if no remand had been made.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1928–2018 · leading case: LaBeree v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2010 WI App 148 (Wis. Ct. App. 2010).
LaBeree v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2010 WI App 148 (Wis. Ct. App. 2010). “See Wis. Stat. § 102.24 (1). BACKGROUND ¶ 4. In 1979, LaBeree was severely injured when a train struck his vehicle.”
Doering v. State Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 523 N.W.2d 142 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “, the court may either confirm or set aside LIRC's order or award. If the court sets aside the order, it may either recommit the case to LIRC for further proceedings or it may enter the proper judgment upon LIRC's findings.”
Sheboygan Airways, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n, 245 N.W. 178 (Wis. 1932). “Instead of supplying those findings by its own determination, the circuit court should have remanded the record under sec. 102.24, Stats., to the Industrial Commission for further hearing and proceedings.”
Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. v. McCormick, 217 N.W. 738 (Wis. 1928). “Sec. 102.24, Stats. The Commission having found, upon undisputed proof, that the applicant became disabled during the time that the compensation liability of the employer was insured by the policy issued by the Independence Indemnity Company, the case presents the single…”
Milwaukee Cnty. v. Indus. Comm'n, 279 N.W. 655 (Wis. 1938). “The provisions of sections 102.24 and 102.25 shall likewise govern in so far as the same may be applicable.”
Ehr v. W. Bend Mut. Ins. Co. (In re Est. of Rivera), 908 N.W.2d 486 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “24(2m) provides: A temporary help agency is the employer of an employee whom the temporary help agency has placed with or leased to another employer that compensates the temporary help agency for the employee's services. *148 A temporary help agency is liable under s.”
State v. Indus. Comm'n, 76 N.W.2d 362 (Wis. 1956). “This poses the question of what test should be employed in such a situation by a reviewing court in determining when it should vacate the commission’s award and remand for further proceedings as authorized by sec. 102.24, Stats. It seems to us that where, as in the instant case,…”
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 226 N.W.2d 492 (Wis. 1975). “(Sec. 102.24, Stats.) Where a record was inadequate in a workmen’s compensation case, our court held that .”
Kaegi v. Indus. Comm'n, 285 N.W. 845 (Wis. 1939). “The court’s power to recommit the case to the commission for further hearing or proceedings is fixed by sec. 102.24, Stats., which authorizes recommitment only when the court vacates the award.”
In re State ex rel. Attorney Gen., 264 N.W. 633 (Wis. 1936). “23, and by sections 102.24 and 102.25 pf the statutes, except that the summons in the action for review shall be served upon the governor or such officer or agent as he may from time to time by executive order designate, and that the term ‘ commission ’ as used in said sections…”
State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Fasekas, 269 N.W. 700 (Wis. 1937). “23, and by sections 102.24 and 102.25 of the statutes, .”
Outboard Motor Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 239 N.W. 141 (Wis. 1931). “The necessity for distinguishing in such cases between a recurrence of a former condition and a new onset brought on by subsequent exposure was not suggested at the time of the decision in the Falk Corporation Case, and the rule then stated must be understood and applied as…”
— Wis. Stat. § 102.24(1) — 1 case
Doering v. State Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 523 N.W.2d 142 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “, the court may either confirm or set aside LIRC's order or award. If the court sets aside the order, it may either recommit the case to LIRC for further proceedings or it may enter the proper judgment upon LIRC's findings.”
— Wis. Stat. § 102.24(2m) — 1 case
Ehr v. W. Bend Mut. Ins. Co. (In re Est. of Rivera), 908 N.W.2d 486 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “24(2m) provides: A temporary help agency is the employer of an employee whom the temporary help agency has placed with or leased to another employer that compensates the temporary help agency for the employee's services. *148 A temporary help agency is liable under s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.