Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (2026)
Arrest or conviction record; exceptions and special cases
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
111.335(1m)(a)(a) “Educational agency” means a school district, a cooperative educational service agency, a county children with disabilities education board, a state prison under s. 302.01, a juvenile correctional facility, as defined in s. 938.02 (10p), a secured residential care center for children and youth, as defined in s. 938.02 (15g), the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired, the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, the Mendota Mental Health Institute, the Winnebago Mental Health Institute, a state center for the developmentally disabled, a private school, a charter school, a private, nonprofit, nonsectarian agency under contract with a school board under s. 118.153 (3) (c), or a nonsectarian private school or agency under contract with the board of school directors in a 1st class city under s. 119.235 (1).
111.335(1m)(b)1.1. A violation specified in ch. 940 or s. 948.02, 948.025, 948.03, 948.05, 948.051, 948.055, 948.06, 948.07, 948.072, 948.075, 948.08, 948.085, or 948.095.
111.335(1m)(b)2.2. A violation of the law of another jurisdiction that would be a violation described in subd. 1. if committed in this state.
111.335(1m)(c)(c) “State licensing agency” means a licensing agency that is an agency, as defined in s. 227.01 (1).
111.335(1m)(d)1.1. A violation of s. 948.02 (1) or (2), 948.025, 948.03 (2) (a) or (c) or (5) (a) 1., 2., 3., or 4., 948.05, 948.051, 948.055, 948.07, 948.072, 948.08, 948.085, 948.095, or 948.30 (2).
111.335(1m)(d)3.3. A violation of the law of another jurisdiction that would be a violation described in subd. 1. or 2. if committed in this state.
111.335(2)(a)(a) Employment discrimination because of arrest record includes, but is not limited to, requesting an applicant, employee, member, licensee or any other individual, on an application form or otherwise, to supply information regarding any arrest record of the individual except a record of a pending charge, except that it is not employment discrimination to request such information when employment depends on the bondability of the individual under a standard fidelity bond or when an equivalent bond is required by state or federal law, administrative regulation or established business practice of the employer and the individual may not be bondable due to an arrest record.
111.335(2)(b)(b) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of arrest record to refuse to employ or license, or to suspend from employment or licensing, any individual who is subject to a pending criminal charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or licensed activity, except as provided in sub. (4) (a).
111.335(3)(a)(a) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to refuse to employ or license, or to bar or terminate from employment or licensing, any individual if any of the following applies to the individual:
111.335(3)(a)1.1. Subject to sub. (4) (b) to (d), the individual has been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or licensed activity.
111.335(3)(a)2.2. The individual is not bondable under a standard fidelity bond or an equivalent bond where such bondability is required by state or federal law, administrative regulation, or established business practice of the employer.
111.335(3)(b)(b) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to refuse to employ a person in a business licensed under s. 440.26 or as an employee specified in s. 440.26 (5) (b) if the person has been convicted of a felony and has not been pardoned for that felony.
111.335(3)(c)(c) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to refuse to employ as an installer of burglar alarms a person who has been convicted of a felony and has not been pardoned for that felony.
111.335(3)(d)(d) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to refuse to employ in a position in the classified service a person who has been convicted under 50 USC 3811 for refusing to register with the selective service system and who has not been pardoned.
111.335(3)(e)(e) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for an educational agency to refuse to employ or to terminate from employment an individual who has been convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony.
111.335(3)(f)(f) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to refuse to employ or license, or to bar or terminate from employment or licensure, any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s. 440.52 (13) (c).
111.335(4)(a)(a) It is employment discrimination because of arrest record for a licensing agency to refuse to license any individual under sub. (2) (b) or to suspend an individual from licensing under sub. (2) (b) solely because the individual is subject to a pending criminal charge, unless the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular licensed activity and the charge is for any of the following:
111.335(4)(b)(b) It is employment discrimination because of conviction record for a licensing agency to refuse to license any individual under sub. (3) (a) 1. or to bar or terminate an individual from licensing under sub. (3) (a) 1. because the individual was adjudicated delinquent under ch. 938 for an offense other than an exempt offense.
111.335(4)(c)1.1. If a licensing agency refuses to license an individual under sub. (3) (a) 1. or bars or terminates an individual from licensing under sub. (3) (a) 1., the licensing agency shall, subject to subd. 2., do all of the following:
111.335(4)(c)1.a.a. State in writing its reasons for doing so, including a statement of how the circumstances of the offense relate to the particular licensed activity.
111.335(4)(c)1.b.b. Allow the individual to show evidence of rehabilitation and fitness to engage in the licensed activity under par. (d). If the individual shows competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and fitness to perform the licensed activity under par. (d), the licensing agency may not refuse to license the individual or bar or terminate the individual from licensing based on that conviction.
111.335(4)(c)2.2. The requirements under subd. 1. a. and b. do not apply if a conviction is for an exempt offense.
111.335(4)(d)1.1. Competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and fitness to perform the licensed activity under par. (c) 1. b. may be established by the production of any of the following:
111.335(4)(d)1.a.a. The individual’s most recent certified copy of a federal department of defense form DD-214 showing the person’s honorable discharge, or separation under honorable conditions, from the U.S. armed forces for military service rendered following conviction for any offense that would otherwise disqualify the individual from the license sought, except that the discharge form is not competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and fitness to perform the licensed activity if the individual was convicted of any misdemeanor or felony subsequent to the date of the honorable discharge or separation from military service.
111.335(4)(d)1.b.b. A copy of the local, state, or federal release document; and either a copy of the relevant department of corrections document showing completion of probation, extended supervision, or parole; or other evidence that at least one year has elapsed since release from any local, state, or federal correctional institution without subsequent conviction of a crime along with evidence showing compliance with all terms and conditions of probation, extended supervision, or parole.
111.335(4)(d)2.2. In addition to the documentary evidence that may be provided under subd. 1. to show sufficient rehabilitation and fitness to perform the licensed activity under par. (c) 1. b., the licensing agency shall consider any of the following evidence presented by the individual:
111.335(4)(d)2.a.a. Evidence of the nature and seriousness of any offense of which he or she was convicted.
111.335(4)(d)2.b.b. Evidence of all circumstances relative to the offense, including mitigating circumstances or social conditions surrounding the commission of the offense.
111.335(4)(d)2.e.e. Letters of reference by persons who have been in contact with the individual since the applicant’s release from any local, state, or federal correctional institution.
111.335(4)(e)(e) A state licensing agency that may refuse to license individuals under sub. (3) (a) 1. or that may bar or terminate an individual from licensure under sub. (3) (a) 1. shall publish on the agency’s Internet site a document indicating the offenses or kinds of offenses that may result in such a refusal, bar, or termination.
111.335(4)(f)1.1. A state licensing agency that may refuse to license individuals under sub. (3) (a) 1. or that may bar or terminate individuals from licensing under sub. (3) (a) 1. shall allow an individual who does not possess a license to, without submitting a full application and without paying the fees applicable to applicants, apply to the agency for a determination of whether the individual would be disqualified from obtaining the license due to his or her conviction record.
111.335(4)(f)2.2. A state licensing agency shall make a determination under subd. 1. in writing and send the determination to the applicant no later than 30 days after receiving the application for a determination.
111.335(4)(f)3.3. A determination made under subd. 1., with respect to convictions reviewed by the state licensing agency as part of the determination, shall be binding upon the agency if the individual subsequently applies for the applicable license, unless there is information relevant to the determination that was not available to the agency at the time of the determination.
111.335(4)(f)4.4. A state licensing agency may require a fee to be paid to the agency for a determination issued under subd. 1. of an amount necessary to cover the cost of making the determination.
111.335(4)(f)5.5. A state licensing agency described in subd. 1. shall create a form on which an individual applying for a determination under subd. 1. may do all of the following:
111.335(4)(f)5.b.b. Identify the date of conviction for any crime described under subd. 5. a. and describe the nature and circumstances of the crime.
111.335(4)(f)5.c.c. Sign his or her name to attest to the accuracy and truthfulness of the information under subd. 5. a. and b. and, if applicable, to acknowledge the agency’s authority to conduct an investigation of the individual.
111.335(4)(f)6.6. A state licensing agency described in subd. 1. shall promulgate rules to implement this paragraph, except that the department of safety and professional services may promulgate rules defining uniform procedures for making such determinations to be used by the department of safety and professional services, the real estate appraisers board, and all examining boards and affiliated credentialing boards attached to the department of safety and professional services or an examining board.
111.335(4)(h)(h) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to revoke, suspend or refuse to renew a license or permit under ch. 125 if the person holding or applying for the license or permit has been convicted of one or more of the following:
111.335(4)(h)1.1. Manufacturing, distributing or delivering a controlled substance or controlled substance analog under s. 961.41 (1).
111.335(4)(h)2.2. Possessing, with intent to manufacture, distribute or deliver, a controlled substance or controlled substance analog under s. 961.41 (1m).
111.335(4)(h)3.3. Possessing, with intent to manufacture, distribute or deliver, or manufacturing, distributing or delivering a controlled substance or controlled substance analog under a federal law that is substantially similar to s. 961.41 (1) or (1m).
111.335(4)(h)4.4. Possessing, with intent to manufacture, distribute or deliver, or manufacturing, distributing or delivering a controlled substance or controlled substance analog under the law of another state that is substantially similar to s. 961.41 (1) or (1m).
111.335(4)(h)5.5. Possessing any of the materials listed in s. 961.65 with intent to manufacture methamphetamine under that section or under a federal law or a law of another state that is substantially similar to s. 961.65.
111.335(4)(i)1.1. Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to deny or refuse to renew a license or permit under s. 440.26 to a person who has been convicted of a felony and has not been pardoned for that felony.
111.335(4)(i)2.2. Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record to revoke a license or permit under s. 440.26 (6) (b) if the person holding the license or permit has been convicted of a felony and has not been pardoned for that felony.
111.335(4)(j)(j) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for the board of nursing to refuse to license an individual in accordance with s. 441.51 (3) (c) 7. and 8.
111.335(4)(jm)(jm) Notwithstanding s. 111.322, it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for the physician assistant affiliated credentialing board to refuse to grant to an individual a compact privilege, as defined in s. 448.988 (2) (b), in accordance with s. 448.988 (4) (a) 3.
111.335 HistoryHistory: 1981 c. 334; 1991 a. 216; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 448, 461; 1997 a. 112; 2001 a. 16; 2003 a. 33; 2005 a. 14; 2009 a. 300; 2011 a. 32, 83; 2013 a. 20 ss. 2365m, 9448; 2017 a. 59, 135, 278; 2021 a. 238 ss. 20, 45; 2023 a. 81; 2025 a. 88.
111.335 AnnotationA rule adopted under s. 165.85 properly barred a nonpardoned felon from holding a police job. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon Station, 101 Wis. 2d 472, 305 N.W.2d 89 (1981).
111.335 AnnotationA conviction for armed robbery in and of itself constituted circumstances substantially related to a school bus driver’s licensure. Gibson v. Transportation Commission, 106 Wis. 2d 22, 315 N.W.2d 346 (1982).
111.335 AnnotationAn employer’s inquiry is limited to general facts in determining whether the “circumstances of the offense” relate to the job. It is not the details of the criminal activity that are important, but rather the circumstances that foster criminal activity, such as opportunity for criminal behavior, reaction to responsibility, and character traits of the person. County of Milwaukee v. LIRC, 139 Wis. 2d 805, 407 N.W.2d 908 (1987).
111.335 AnnotationThere is no requirement that an employer take affirmative steps to accommodate individuals convicted of felonies. Knight v. LIRC, 220 Wis. 2d 137, 582 N.W.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1998), 97-1606.
111.335 AnnotationCourts must apply the substantial relationship test under sub. (3) (a) 1. to a domestic violence conviction the same way as to any other conviction. Courts must look beyond any immaterial identity between circumstances—such as the domestic context of the offense or an intimate relationship with the victim—and instead examine the circumstances material to fostering criminal activity. The material circumstances are those that exist in the workplace that present opportunities for recidivism given the character traits revealed by the circumstances of a domestic violence conviction. In addition to character traits, courts must consider other relevant and readily ascertainable circumstances of the offense such as the seriousness and number of offenses, how recent the conviction is, and whether there is a pattern of behavior. Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15, 400 Wis. 2d 827, 970 N.W.2d 837, 19-1671.
111.335 AnnotationThe Wisconsin Fair Employment Act does not prohibit terminating employees with arrest records. Rather, it prohibits terminating employees “because of” their arrest records. An employer does not lose its ability to terminate an employee by referring a matter to the police, and the employer remains free to terminate the employee after the referral for any lawful reason. If the employer in fact believes the employee is guilty independent of arrest records, the employer could terminate the employee because of that belief. Oconomowoc Area School District v. Cota, 2025 WI 11, 416 Wis. 2d 1, 20 N.W.3d 182, 22-1158.
111.335 AnnotationWhen evaluating an individual for the position of reserve officer, a sheriff’s department may consider information in its possession concerning the individual’s juvenile record, subject to prohibitions against arrest record and conviction record discrimination contained in the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act. 79 Atty. Gen. 89.
111.335 AnnotationDouble Jeopardy: Race, Crime, and Getting a Job. Pager. 2005 WLR 617.
111.335 AnnotationDiscrimination in employment on the basis of arrest or conviction record. Mukamal. WBB Sept. 1983.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022).
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
Knight v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 582 N.W.2d 448 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “See § 111.335, Stats. As a result, LIRC correctly found that no such accommodation is required, regardless of whether Knight believes that such an accommodation would further the purpose and spirit of WFEA.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F. Supp. 1479 (E.D. Wis. 1996). “Most significantly, § 111.335 states the following: Notwithstanding s.”
Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Int'l Union, Allied Indus. Workers of Am., 748 F. Supp. 1352 (E.D. Wis. 1990). “See Wis.Stat. § 111.335. 12 . The Seventh Circuit did discuss the public policy exception in Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of Am., 123 F.3d 490 (7th Cir. 1997). “” Wis. Stat. Ann. § 111.335 . 34 Whether an employee or prospective employee has a past arrest or conviction for, let us say, sexual assault, would be highly relevant to the individual’s inclination to engage in sexual harassment or even rape, but in most instances such…”
Jackson v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2006 WI App 97 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “See Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(e). It is also reasonably clear that at least one basis for Jackson's challenge is that LIRC has expanded the meaning of this statutory provision beyond that intended by the legislature.”
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2002 WI App 199 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “Section 111.335(1)(c)1. Therefore, we must decide if DWD can investigate and decide whether the circumstances of Wagner's theft conviction are substantially related to the circumstances of his job as a firefighter, or if the just cause determination made by *361 the PFC pursuant…”
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 111.335(1)(c)1. (2015-16)3 of demonstrating that Palmer had “been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances” of the Applications Specialist job.”
Nat. Landscapes, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 111.335(3)(a)1. (2023-24).1 We disagree and affirm the order upholding the Commission’s decision.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(1)(c) — 2 cases
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2002 WI App 199 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “Section 111.335(1)(c)1. Therefore, we must decide if DWD can investigate and decide whether the circumstances of Wagner's theft conviction are substantially related to the circumstances of his job as a firefighter, or if the just cause determination made by *361 the PFC pursuant…”
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 111.335(1)(c)1. (2015-16)3 of demonstrating that Palmer had “been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances” of the Applications Specialist job.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(1m)(b) — 2 cases
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(2) — 1 case
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(2)(a) — 1 case
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(2)(b) — 2 cases
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3) — 1 case
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3)(a) — 5 cases
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
Nat. Landscapes, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 111.335(3)(a)1. (2023-24).1 We disagree and affirm the order upholding the Commission’s decision.”
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 111.335(1)(c)1. (2015-16)3 of demonstrating that Palmer had “been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor or other offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances” of the Applications Specialist job.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3)(b) — 1 case
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3)(c) — 1 case
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3)(e) — 2 cases
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(3)(f) — 3 cases
Cree, Inc. v. LIRC, 2022 WI 15 (Wis. 2022). “" 1 While this case was being litigated, Wis. Stat. § 111.335 (1)(c)1. (2015-16) was renumbered to Wis.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(4)(a) — 2 cases
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025). “§ 111.335(2)(a) (emphasis added). Another provides that it is not conviction-record discrimination10 to refuse to employ or terminate from employment “any individual who has been convicted of any offense under s.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(4)(b) — 1 case
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2024 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 111.335, which contains exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(l)(b) — 1 case
Knight v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 582 N.W.2d 448 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “See § 111.335, Stats. As a result, LIRC correctly found that no such accommodation is required, regardless of whether Knight believes that such an accommodation would further the purpose and spirit of WFEA.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(l)(c) — 2 cases
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis, 936 F. Supp. 1479 (E.D. Wis. 1996). “Most significantly, § 111.335 states the following: Notwithstanding s.”
Knight v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 582 N.W.2d 448 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “See § 111.335, Stats. As a result, LIRC correctly found that no such accommodation is required, regardless of whether Knight believes that such an accommodation would further the purpose and spirit of WFEA.”
— Wis. Stat. § 111.335(l)(e) — 1 case
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2002 WI App 199 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “Section 111.335(1)(c)1. Therefore, we must decide if DWD can investigate and decide whether the circumstances of Wagner's theft conviction are substantially related to the circumstances of his job as a firefighter, or if the just cause determination made by *361 the PFC pursuant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.