Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 115.758 (2026)

Construction

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

115.758115.758 Construction. To the extent possible, this subchapter shall be construed in a manner that is consistent with 20 USC 1400 to 1482 and is consistent with the purposes specified in 20 USC 1400 (d).

115.758 HistoryHistory: 1997 a. 164; 2005 a. 258.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2009 · leading case: JAMIE S. v. Milwaukee Pub. Schs., 519 F. Supp. 2d 870 (E.D. Wis. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

JAMIE S. v. Milwaukee Pub. Schs., 519 F. Supp. 2d 870 (E.D. Wis. 2007). · cites it 2× “(“IDEA”) and related state statutes, Wis. Stat. §§ 115.758 , et seq. Upon the written consent of the parties to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge, the case was reassigned to this court on November 28, 2001.”

Calumet Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Randall H., 2002 WI 126 (Wis. 2002). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 115.758 . 5 Randall conflates the IEP and the CHIPS order to argue that Robert's placement at Lakeview was precipitated by his educational needs.”

Rosinsky Ex Rel. Rosinsky v. Green Bay Area Sch. Dist., 667 F. Supp. 2d 964 (E.D. Wis. 2009). · cites it 2× “, and its Wisconsin equivalent, Wis. Stat. § 115.758 et seq. ALJ Pederson found that the Green Bay Area School District (“the District”) complied with federal and state special education law regarding Alex’s evaluation, individualized education program (“IEP”) team…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.