Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 13.01 (2026)
Number of legislators
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2021 · leading case: AllEnergy Corp. v. Trempealeau Cnty. Env't & Land Use Comm., 2017 WI 52 (Wis. 2017).
AllEnergy Corp. v. Trempealeau Cnty. Env't & Land Use Comm., 2017 WI 52 (Wis. 2017). “" Trempealeau County Zoning Ordinance § 13.01. ¶43 The zoning ordinance governing non-metallic mineral mining sets forth another eight factors the Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use Committee shall consider, "among other factors," when considering an application for a…”
City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Vets. of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Auth. of Milwaukee, 2009 WI 84 (Wis. 2009). “"); 4 Phillip Nichols, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 13.01 [16] (3d ed. 2007) (stating that the unit rule applies "when there are different interests or estates in the property acquired by condemnation" and that "[p]ursuant to the unit rule, the proper course is to determine the…”
HMO-W INC. v. SSM Health Care Sys., 2003 WI App 137 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “The terms defined, and the *101 definitions used, are almost identical to those used in § 13.01 of the Revised Model Act. The definition for "interest," found in § 180.”
Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 305 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. Wis. 1969). “Section 13.01, entitled “Consolidation, Merger or Sale of Assets Permitted”, provides in relevant part that “The company covenants that it will not merge or consolidate with any other corporation or sell or convey all or substantially all of its assets to any person, firm or…”
City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Vets. of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Auth. of the City of Milwaukee, 2008 WI App 24 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). “" 4-13 Nichols, Eminent Domain § 13.01[16] § 13-28. There are two parts to the *525 rule: "(1) there can be no separate valuation of improvements or natural attributes of the land; and (2) the manner in which the land is owned or the number of owners should not affect the value…”
POST NO. 2874 VFW. v. Redevelopment Auth., 2009 WI 84 (Wis. 2009). “" 4 Nichols on Eminent Domain § 13.01[16][a] (3d ed. 2007). "[The] rule exists for the protection of the condemnor," as it ensures that the aggregate value of the separate interests in the property cannot exceed the property's value as an unencumbered whole.”
Kathleen K. Navis v. Door Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “DOOR COUNTY, WI, COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE § 13.01(5). ¶16 The fact that the Board is authorized to make conditions to “minimize” adverse effects from the proposed use further supports our conclusion that the Ordinance does not require an applicant to prove that there would…”
— Wis. Stat. § 13.01(5) — 1 case
Kathleen K. Navis v. Door Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment (Wis. Ct. App. 2021). “DOOR COUNTY, WI, COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE § 13.01(5). ¶16 The fact that the Board is authorized to make conditions to “minimize” adverse effects from the proposed use further supports our conclusion that the Ordinance does not require an applicant to prove that there would…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.