Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 13.06 (2026)

Executive favor

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13.0613.06 Executive favor. Any member of the legislature who gives, offers or promises to give his or her vote or influence in favor of or against any measure or proposition pending or proposed to be introduced in the legislature, or that has already been passed by either house of the legislature, in consideration of or on condition that the governor approve, disapprove, veto or sign, or agree to approve, disapprove, veto or sign, any other measure or proposition pending or proposed to be introduced in the legislature or that has already been passed by the legislature, or either house thereof, or in consideration or upon condition that the governor nominate for appointment or appoint or remove any person to or from any office or position under the laws of this state, is guilty of a Class I felony.

13.06 HistoryHistory: 1991 a. 316; 1997 a. 35, 283; 2001 a. 109.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1976–2004 · leading case: State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Stitt, 338 N.W.2d 684 (Wis. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Stitt, 338 N.W.2d 684 (Wis. 1983). · cites it 2× “, supra , the question was whether sec. 13.06, Stats., which required the legislature to refer appropriation bills to the joint committee on finance before passage, meant that such bills had to be referred by each house before final passage.”

United States v. Parkison, 417 F. Supp. 730 (E.D. Wis. 1976). “” See, Devitt and Blackmar, § 13.06. It is defendant’s position that the final sentence permits the jury to infer one element of the crime from proof of the other elements.”

Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2004 WI App 171 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “For example, 7A NICHOLS ON EMINENT DOMAIN § 13.06 states that "[n]either buyer nor seller [can be] under undue pressure to buy or sell"; and "if a sales transaction does not meet the definition of market value, [3] then the sale cannot be used as a market indicator of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.