Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (2026)
Declaration of policy
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
15.001(1)(1) Three branches of government. The “republican form of government” guaranteed by the U.S. constitution contemplates the separation of powers within state government among the legislative, the executive and the judicial branches of the government. The legislative branch has the broad objective of determining policies and programs and review of program performance for programs previously authorized, the executive branch carries out the programs and policies and the judicial branch has the responsibility for adjudicating any conflicts which might arise from the interpretation or application of the laws. It is a traditional concept of American government that the 3 branches are to function separately, without intermingling of authority, except as specifically provided by law.
15.001(2)(a)(a) As the chief administrative officer of the state, the governor should be provided with the administrative facilities and the authority to carry out the functions of the governor’s office efficiently and effectively within the policy limits established by the legislature.
15.001(2)(b)(b) The administrative agencies which comprise the executive branch should be consolidated into a reasonable number of departments and independent agencies consistent with executive capacity to administer effectively at all levels.
15.001(2)(c)(c) The integration of the agencies in the executive branch should be on a functional basis, so that programs can be coordinated.
15.001(2)(d)(d) Each agency in the executive branch should be assigned a name commensurate with the scope of its program responsibilities, and should be integrated into one of the departments or independent agencies of the executive branch as closely as the conflicting goals of administrative integration and responsiveness to the legislature will permit.
15.001(3)(3) Goals of continuing reorganization. Structural reorganization should be a continuing process through careful executive and legislative appraisal of the placement of proposed new programs and the coordination of existing programs in response to changing emphasis or public needs, and should be consistent with the following goals:
15.001(3)(a)(a) The organization of state government should assure its responsiveness to popular control. It is the goal of reorganization to improve legislative policy-making capability and to improve the administrative capability of the executive to carry out these policies.
15.001(3)(b)(b) The organization of state government should facilitate communication between citizens and government. It is the goal of reorganization through coordination of related programs in function-oriented departments to improve public understanding of government programs and policies and to improve the relationships between citizens and administrative agencies.
15.001(3)(c)(c) The organization of state government shall assure efficient and effective administration of the policies established by the legislature. It is the goal of reorganization to promote efficiency by improving the management and coordination of state services and by eliminating overlapping activities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2006 WI App 216 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006).
Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2006 WI App 216 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “1985); see also Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (1). 10 It is also well established that it is the judiciary's exclusive responsibility to adjudicate "any conflicts which might arise from the interpretation or application of the laws," which necessarily includes determining the…”
Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott Walker, 2016 WI 38 (Wis. 2016). “15, Structure of the Executive Branch; Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (2)(a) ("As the chief administrative officer of the state, the governor should be provided with the administrative facilities and the authority to carry out the functions of the governor's office efficiently and…”
State Ex Rel. Unnamed v. Connors, 401 N.W.2d 782 (Wis. 1987). “Under our republican form of governmentdefined as a government of separation of powers (sec. 15.001, Stats.), the function imposed upon the judiciary by the statute is one that it is without power to perform.”
State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. Thompson, 424 N.W.2d 385 (Wis. 1988). “; Sec. 15.001, Stats. While the governor has been granted the constitutional power to convene the legislature on extraordinary occasions, to recommend expedient matters for the legislature's consideration, to direct the preparation of the state biennial budget and to approve the…”
State v. Jensen, 2004 WI App 89 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “" Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (1). We next explore other sources for the defendants' duties in light of this general pronouncement.”
J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Bldg. Comm'n, 336 N.W.2d 679 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). “The legislature itself has provided a textbook description in sec. 15.001(1), Stats., which provides in relevant part: The legislative branch has the broad objective of determining policies and programs and review of program performance for programs previously authorized, the…”
State v. Chvala, 2004 WI App 53 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “" Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (1). We examine other sources of Chvala's duty in light of this general declaration.”
Timothy Zignego v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2020 WI App 17 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 15.001. We briefly summarize pertinent provisions of that chapter.”
Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2006 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “See Wis. Stat. §§ 15.001 (2), 15.01(2), 15.06, and 15.”
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42 (Wis. 2020). “See Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (2); Koschkee v. Taylor, 2019 WI 76, ¶14 , 387 Wis.”
Avenue, Inc. v. La Follette, 515 N.W.2d 339 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “See § 15.001, STATS. It is a longstanding rule that administrative departments and agencies, created by the legislature as another part of the executive branch, have only such powers as are expressly granted to them or necessarily implied from the legislature.”
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42 (Wis. 2020). “See Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (2); Koschkee v. Taylor, 2019 WI 76, ¶14 , 387 Wis.”
— Wis. Stat. § 15.001(1) — 2 cases
Helgeland v. Wisconsin Municipalities, 2006 WI App 216 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “1985); see also Wis. Stat. § 15.001 (1). 10 It is also well established that it is the judiciary's exclusive responsibility to adjudicate "any conflicts which might arise from the interpretation or application of the laws," which necessarily includes determining the…”
J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Bldg. Comm'n, 336 N.W.2d 679 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). “The legislature itself has provided a textbook description in sec. 15.001(1), Stats., which provides in relevant part: The legislative branch has the broad objective of determining policies and programs and review of program performance for programs previously authorized, the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 15.001(2) — 1 case
Dwd v. Lirc, 2006 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.